ShareThis Page
Penguins notebook: Gibbons could return in Game 2 |

Penguins notebook: Gibbons could return in Game 2

| Saturday, May 3, 2014 6:48 p.m

Penguins right wing Brian Gibbons confirmed on Saturday that he has been medically cleared to participate in games. He hasn’t played since sustaining an injury against the Columbus Blue Jackets in Game 2 of the opening round of the Stanley Cup playoffs.

Gibbons scored two early goals in that game before departing with the injury.

“I’m feeling better in practice these past few days,” Gibbons said. “Whenever the time comes, I’ll be ready.”

Coach Dan Bylsma said during the Columbus series that it was likely the Penguins would find room in their lineup for Gibbons when he was able to play.

Gibbons admits he’s hungry for a return to the lineup.

“Anyone who isn’t playing for whatever reason,” Gibbons said, “wants to play.”

One of Gibbons’ goals against Columbus came on a shorthanded breakaway. His speed could give the Penguins something they’ve lacked most of the season — a threat to score while down a man.

“I don’t know if I’ve always been good at (killing penalties),” Gibbons said. “But I’ve always liked it. I killed a lot of penalties in college and at Wilkes-Barre. I take pride in it.”

Orpik skates

Defenseman Brooks Orpik skated for the first time since leaving practice one week ago.

It remains unknown if he will participate Sunday in Game 2 between the Penguins and Rangers.

Orpik has missed the Penguins’ past three games, the first three Stanley Cup playoff games he has ever missed.

He participated in a light workout at Southpointe with about a dozen teammates. Per team policy, Orpik wasn’t permitted to speak with reporters following the workout because he technically wasn’t joining the team for practice, but was skating on his own to test the injury.

Orpik was seen on an exercise bike last week in Columbus, but the nature of his injury remains a mystery. In his absence, regular defense partner Paul Martin has skated with defenseman Kris Letang.

Intensity, anyone?

A number of Penguins have commented following playoff games this spring that the opposition was “more prepared” and “more desperate.”

This was the case after Game 1 against the Rangers.

One day later, one of the Penguins’ most intense players is hoping to see a change.

“It’s hard to say what the problem’s been,” defenseman Robert Bortuzzo said. “We are a team of guys who care about winning. That’s our top priority. It’s hard to pinpoint what (the problem is). But it wasn’t there. It should be this time of year.”

Taking it easy

The Penguins held a lightly attended optional practice at Southpointe.

Among players who played in Game 1 and who skated on Saturday included forward Craig Adams, goalie Marc-Andre Fleury and defensemen Bortuzzo and Olli Maatta.

Other players who participated included Orpik, defenseman Deryk Engelland, forwards Gibbons, Jayson Megna, Taylor Pyatt, Chris Conner, and goalies Tomas Vokoun and Jeff Zatkoff.

Josh Yohe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @JoshYohe_Trib.

Categories: Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.