ShareThis Page
Penguins notebook: Johnston wants Malkin to shoot the puck more often |

Penguins notebook: Johnston wants Malkin to shoot the puck more often

BUFFALO, N.Y. — Penguins coach Mike Johnston wants center Evgeni Malkin to shoot the puck with more frequency.

While Johnston is pleased with Malkin’s performance this season, he said he believes Malkin’s inability to score an even-strength goal before the Penguins’ 6-1 victory Saturday — when he scored his first — was because he was not shooting the puck enough.

Through 12 games, Malkin put 28 shots on goal, or 2.33 per game.

“His shot total is one thing that really has to go up,” Johnston said. “He has a great shot. He just has to use it more.”

Malkin has played on a line with wingers Pascal Dupuis and Blake Comeau most of this season.

Johnston wants more production from that line, but he said his team’s level of play at even-strength must increase. The Penguins have been a special teams juggernaut early this season, and while they had outscored the opposition 28-19 in even-strength situations before Saturday, the coach wants to see more.

• Johnston appeared amused when a Buffalo reporter mentioned that some questioned Sidney Crosby’s leadership during the 2014 postseason.

“I’ve seen nothing of that,” Johnston said. “Everything I see is that he leads by example. Look at the great leaders in this game over time. It’s usually people who lead by example. The great work ethic. He’s a great example of that. I think he’s done a great job.”

— Josh Yohe

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.