Penguins notebook: No update on Hornqvist’s status |

Penguins notebook: No update on Hornqvist’s status

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Patric Hornqvist and the Blue Jackets' David Savard fight for the puck down the boards in the first period Thursday, April 20, 2017 at PPG Paints Arena.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Patric Hornqvist celebrates his goal against the Blue Jackets in the second period Tuesday, April 4, 2017 at PPG Paints Arena.

As a net-front specialist, winger Patric Hornqvist absorbs as much physical punishment as almost any of the Penguins, but for the second time this season, the fiery Swede might miss games because of damage done by a hunk of rubber.

Hornqvist left Saturday’s Game 2 after stepping in front of a John Carlson slapshot late in the first period. As of Sunday morning, his status remained unknown.

“We don’t have any updates on our players,” coach Mike Sullivan said via a conference call. “They’re all going to be evaluated when we get back (to Pittsburgh).”

Hornqvist left Verizon Center in a walking boot after arriving at the arena with plans to infuse Sidney Crosby’s line with a little more “snarl,” as Sullivan often describes it.

Line shuffling ensued after Hornqvist left. Fortunately for the Penguins, if Hornqvist must miss time, a similar type of player, Scott Wilson, waits in the wings. Wilson served as a healthy scratch in Game 2 after Carl Hagelin returned to the lineup.

Sullivan reiterated his view that Crosby’s adaptability makes it fairly easy to adjust the Penguins’ top line without much fretting.

“We’ve had all kinds of people with Sid in my tenure here,” Sullivan said. “One of the first conversations I always have with our guys when we put them with Sid is, ‘Don’t try to change your game. You play your game, and Sid will adjust. Sid will adapt. Because he’s that good.’ ”

Blocking bombs away

Hornqvist’s injury again brought to light the cost and benefit of persistent shot blocking. But Sullivan, as he did earlier this season, stood by the Penguins’ eagerness to get in front of shooters.

The Penguins entered Sunday averaging 22.3 blocks, the most of any team in the playoffs.

“It’s an element of playing team defense,” Sullivan said. “I don’t think our coaching staff is any different than any other coaching staff in the league when it comes to preaching sound defensive strategies. We’re trying to get shot lanes. We’re trying to discourage the puck to getting to our scoring area or our net front as often as we can, and that’s one way that we do it.”

Applause for Olli

Defenseman Olli Maatta’s 143 minutes of ice time through seven playoff games tied Justin Schultz for the team lead.

For Maatta, who missed more than a month late in the season with a hand injury, the workload is welcome. And Sullivan emphasized that, even with his team struggling to string together clean breakouts on a regular basis, he likes Maatta’s contributions in the playoffs and his rapport with Trevor Daley, another defenseman who jumped into playoff hockey after a long injury absence.

“When we’re under pressure in our end zone, I think Olli has the presence of mind to make a subtle play to help us get out of trouble, and that’s what he’s done for us here in the playoffs to this point,” Sullivan said. “Trevor brings some mobility to that pair. I think Trevor brings a veteran presence. I think he has a calming influence on Olli.”

Bill West is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @BWest_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.