Penguins notebook: Sullivan waits to name Game 1 starting goalie |

Penguins notebook: Sullivan waits to name Game 1 starting goalie

Apparently, Penguins coach Mike Sullivan viewed his news conference ahead of Game 6 in the second-round series against the Washington Capitals as a special occasion because he announced his starting goaltender more than 24 hours in advance of that eventual 4-3 overtime win.

He chose Thursday to use more coy comments about who might mind the net in Game 1 of the Eastern Conference finals against Tampa Bay.

“I’ll probably announce it (Friday),” Sullivan said of his starter for Friday’s 8 p.m. game at Consol Energy Center.

The decision to name Matt Murray well ahead of the Penguins’ second-series finale broke from Sullivan’s track record of gamesmanship and seemed to quell a media-driven buzz about whether Marc-Andre Fleury, fully recovered from his concussion and available as a lineup option since Game 3 against the Capitals, represented a better choice.

Murray made 36 saves in the clincher.

Asked whether a new series presented him an opportunity to view the lineup as a clean slate, Sullivan indicated it did not.

“I’m not sure it is different (than mid-series lineup decisions),” Sullivan said. “I think it’s not unlike any other position that we discuss when we make a lineup decision. We’re trying to make the best lineup decisions that we think gives this team the best chance to win. We have these discussions internally. … I think we’re very fortunate because we have the options that we have. We’ve got very capable people at a lot of positions, but goaltending in particular, we’ve got three guys (Murray, Fleury and Jeff Zatkoff) that have helped us win and been significant contributors to getting this team to where it is at this point.”

Art of the deal

Jim Rutherford made sure to poke some fun at his own history of trades before members of the media tackled the issue after the Penguins general manager’s news conference at UPMC Lemieux Sports Complex in Cranberry.

Rutherford knows the public perception of his decision-making on deals probably won’t get any better than it is right now, with forwards Phil Kessel, Carl Hagelin and Nick Bonino and defensemen Trevor Daley and Justin Schultz regarded as savvy acquisitions and valuable contributors for the Penguins.

Rutherford also knows he’s one of the few GMs who aggressively swaps players in an increasingly cautious league.

“It certainly is a lot more difficult to make player transactions now in the cap system,” Rutherford said. “And the further you go into a cap system, the harder it gets, because you have to sign players to certain contracts that you’re not always totally comfortable with. You may have to give him an extra year or whatever, or you’re going to lose them. So it does become more difficult.

“In our case, we had to get creative. The one deal with Chicago, we had to take back money on (Rob) Scuderi to make that deal work. In some ways, our misfortune early in the year with (Pascal Dupuis, who retired because of blood clot-related complications) became our good fortune as we went along, because it opened up the opportunity to have more cap space and make deals. If that injury hadn’t happened and we couldn’t put him on (long-time injured reserve), we couldn’t do it.”

Bill West is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @BWest_Trib.

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Penguins goaltender Matt Murray gets beat by a Alex Ovechkin shot during game 5 of the Eastern Conference second-round playoff series Saturday, May 7, 2016 at Verizon Center.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.