Penguins position breakdown: Team enjoys glut on left wing |

Penguins position breakdown: Team enjoys glut on left wing

Jonathan Bombulie
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Jake Guentzel celebrates his goal in the third period against the Capitals during game 4 of round 2 Stanley Cup Playoffs Tuesday, May 3, 2018 at PPG Paints Arena.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Flyers' Andrew MacDonald defends on the Penguins' Jake Guentzel in the first period Friday, April 20, 2018 at PPG Paints Arena.

Editor’s note: Heading into the NHL draft June 22-23 and the opening of the free-agent signing period July 1, staff writer Jonathan Bombulie will conduct a six-part, position-by-position examination of the team’s organizational depth chart.

Put aside salary cap concerns. Forget gauging how long a team’s championship window will stay open. Shelve those Phil Kessel rumors for a while.

On the most basic level, the easiest way a hockey team can improve in the offseason is trade from a position where there’s an excess to bolster a position where there’s a void.

For the Penguins this summer, left wing is a position of excess. The team has one budding star and five other players capable of playing a regular shift on a championship-caliber team.

One of them easily could be moved to shore up a weakness, like on defense, for example.

The budding star, incidentally, is Jake Guentzel. After a decent regular season, he was brilliant in the playoffs for the second straight year. He finished tied for fifth in the league in postseason scoring, even though he played two full rounds fewer than those around him on the leaderboard.

In fact, the emergence of Guentzel as a permanent fixture on the left side of the top line might end up being the most lasting effect of the 2018 playoffs for the Penguins.

In the NHL

Jake Guentzel

Last year: 22-26—48. Age: 23. Years left on contract: 1

Carl Hagelin

Last year: 10-21—31. Age: 29. Years left on contract: 1

Conor Sheary

Last year: 18-12—30. Age: 26. Years left on contract: 2

Tom Kuhnhackl

Last year: 2-6—8. Age: 26. Years left on contract: RFA

Zach Aston-Reese

Last year: 4-2—6. Age: 23. Years left on contract: 1

Dominik Simon

Last year: 4-8—12.Age: 23.Years left on contract: RFA

Guentzel’s four-goal performance in Game 6 against the Flyers forever will be etched in Penguins history. The big, new contract he’ll get next summer could shape some of the moves the team will make over the next 12 months. … After a horrible start to the year, Hagelin finished strong, cementing his status as a perfect speedy complement to a skilled center. … An 18-goal season with 16 coming at even strength isn’t terrible, but long slumps in the middle of the season and in the playoffs cast a shadow on Sheary. … Kuhnhackl’s defensive resume is solid, but there’s a baseline of offensive production that all NHL regulars, even fourth liners, have to hit. … He’s far from a finished product, but there were glimpses of hard-nose brilliance from Aston-Reese as a rookie. … Simon deservedly will take heat for not scoring when on the top line in the playoffs, but his 200-foot game is pretty good.


Adam Johnson

Height, weight: 6-0, 174. Age: 23

Thomas Di Pauli

Height, weight: 5-11, 188. Age: 24

Garrett Wilson

Height, weight: 6-2, 199.Age: 27

Johnson, the darling of last year’s development camp, and Di Pauli, who has battled injuries the past two seasons, haven’t exactly been tearing up the AHL. They’re “on the verge” because they’re both excellent skaters.


Jordy Bellerive

Height, weight: 5-10, 195. Age: 19

Sam Miletic

Height, weight: 6-0, 197. Age: 21

Kasper Bjorkqvist

Height, weight: 6-1, 198. Age: 20

Freddie Tiffels

Height, weight: 6-0, 192. Age: 23

Daniel Sprong aside, Bellerive might be the Penguins prospect with the highest upside. The sniper had 46 goals in juniors as an 18-year-old last season. … Because he did it at age 20, Miletic’s 36-goal season in juniors in a little less impressive. He’s still a solid power-forward prospect. … Bjorkqvist, a Finn with some bite to his game, had a breakout year at Providence College.


If general manager Jim Rutherford wants salary cap space for any reason, from exploring free agency to making other trades, Sheary’s $3 million paycheck and Hagelin’s $4 million wage have neon arrows pointing at them. Such moves shouldn’t be undertaken lightly, of course. Both players have been key contributors to championship teams.


With Simon and Aston-Reese on the rise, Kuhnhackl’s fourth-line job probably isn’t as secure as it was a year ago. He will have to battle to avoid the waiver wire.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.