Penguins Predictions: How consistent is Sidney Crosby? |

Penguins Predictions: How consistent is Sidney Crosby?

Editor’s note: Beat writer Jonathan Bombulie will make a series of Penguins predictions leading up to the start of training camp Sept. 14.


Sidney Crosby has recorded between 84 and 89 points in each of the past four seasons. Will his point total stay in the same range this season?


A. Yes.

Ever since returning from the concussion problems that plagued him at the early part of this decade, Crosby has been stunningly consistent. Over the past four seasons, he has played between 75-82 games and recorded between 237-255 shots on goal. There’s no reason to think it will change this season. He’s 31, but studies have shown forwards usually score within 90 percent of their peak through age 32, and that elite scorers often stave off age-related decline into their late 30s. Crosby sometimes takes some good-natured abuse for how superstitious he is and how committed he is to routine. If the end result is scoring at a point-per-game pace for years and years, players should be lining up to stickhandle inside the McDonald’s logo before every game.

B. No. It will go down.

For one thing, even putting the concussion history aside, a player isn’t likely to average 79 games played per season well into his second decade in the league. Injuries are an inevitable part of the game. Second, Crosby’s numbers last season were propped up a bit by an outstanding Penguins power play. He had 29 assists with the man-advantage, his most since 2008-09. If the power play’s success rate slips just a bit from its 26-percent pinnacle, so will Crosby’s point total.

C. No. It will go up.

The show Crosby and Jake Guentzel put on in last season’s playoffs was something to behold. If their success indicates a lasting chemistry, not a one-time hot streak, Crosby will have his most simpatico linemate since the heyday of Chris Kunitz and Pascal Dupuis. Also, Crosby’s shooting percentage was 11.7 last year. His career average is 14.5. His goal total of 29 could bump up a bit. Maybe not all the way up to 44 like two years ago, but definitely into the 30s.


A. Yes.

As Crosby has matured, everything about his game – from his mental preparation to his work ethic in practice – has grown more consistent. He’s in a sweet spot, and it would be foolish to predict a deviation from the standard he’s set the last four seasons. The crux of the question, however, isn’t really related to Crosby’s actions. It’s related to Father Time. When will Crosby experience an age-related drop in production and thus, when will the Penguins’ championship window begin to close? Looking at some recent historical comparisons – all-time great players with a points-per-game average in the neighborhood of Crosby’s 1.29 – the window should stay open for at least another couple of years. Players such as Joe Sakic and Peter Forsberg began to slow down around 32 or 33. Steve Yzerman didn’t really decline significantly until he hit 37 or so. Crosby is still a ways away from a tipping point.

Keep up with the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at [email protected] or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins’ Sidney Crosby watches as his deflection beats Wild goaltender Devan Dubnyk in the first period Thursday, Nov. 10, 2016 at PPG Paints Arena.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.