Penguins Predictions: Which winger will score the most goals? |

Penguins Predictions: Which winger will score the most goals?

Jonathan Bombulie

Editor’s note: Beat writer Jonathan Bombulie will make a series of Penguins predictions leading up to the start of training camp Sept. 14.


Which Penguins winger will score the most goals this season?


A. Phil Kessel

There’s little doubt Kessel is the team’s most dangerous goal-scoring winger. His wrist shot remains one of the most lethal weapons in the entire league. Only 15 active players have scored more career goals than his 330. But there are good reasons to predict he won’t match his 34-goal total from last season. For one thing, his total of 12 power-play goals was abnormally high. Is it reasonable to expect the Penguins to connect on 26 percent of their chances with the man-advantage again? For another, his shooting percentage of 13.0 was greater than his 10.8 career average. If he drops back just a couple of goals, this becomes a very competitive horse race.

B. Patric Hornqvist

Hornqvist is a remarkably consistent scorer, cracking the 20-goal mark for each of the past five seasons. That puts him in a club with only 19 other NHL players. No player on the Penguins roster will be around the net more regularly, which makes him a good choice in any goal-scoring contest. His total of 29 from last year is probably due for a course correction, however. He scored a career-high 15 power-play goals and tied a career best with a shooting percentage of 11.7.

C. Jake Guentzel

It’s probably unfair to put such high expectations on a player in his first NHL season, but Guentzel’s 22-goal total last year could have been considered a mild disappointment after 16 goals in 40 games the year before. Regardless, his playoff performance – 10 goals in 12 games, including four in the series clincher against Philadelphia – erased all that sort of talk, and expectations are soaring again, especially as he enters the final year of his entry level contract. The bottom line is we don’t yet have a good idea of where Guentzel’s ceiling and floor lie when it comes to goal totals. It wouldn’t be a shock if he scored 20. It wouldn’t be a shock if he scored 40.

D. None of the above

Daniel Sprong’s shot is filthy. … Bryan Rust and Carl Hagelin have the speed to put up a monster year if they get shooting luck. … Dominik Simon is a good complement for skilled players. … What if Derick Brassard was a goal-scoring winger masquerading as a center all these years?


A. Phil Kessel

It’s reasonable to predict that Hornqvist’s 29-goal total a year ago was close to the high end of what he’s capable of, so it really comes down to Kessel and Guentzel. Kessel’s total of 34 from last season will probably drop because of a normalization of puck luck if nothing else. Guentzel’s total of 22 is likely to rise because he’s a 23-year-old whose game is still improving. But Kessel gets the power-play minutes that Guentzel doesn’t, so he’ll probably stay ahead on the final tote board.

Keep up with the Pittsburgh Penguins all season long.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at [email protected] or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

Chaz Palla
The Penguins’ Phil Kessel during the first day of practice Friday, Sept. 15, 2017 at UPMC Lemieux Sports Complex.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.