Archive

ShareThis Page
Penguins put Jimmy Hayes, 5 other players on waivers | TribLIVE.com
Penguins/NHL

Penguins put Jimmy Hayes, 5 other players on waivers

264579gtrpens09092318
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins’ Garrett Wilson beats Blue Jackets goaltender Jean-Francois Berube in the third period Saturday, Sept. 22, 2018 at PPG Paints Arena.

In preparation for Sunday night’s round of cuts, the Penguins put six players on waivers Sunday afternoon.

Forwards Jimmy Hayes, Garrett Wilson and Tobias Lindberg, defensemen Chris Summers and Stefan Elliott and goalie John Muse are on waivers. If they’re not claimed Monday, they can be assigned to Wilkes-Barre/Scranton of the AHL.

Forwards Anthony Angello, Teddy Blueger, Joseph Cramarossa, Thomas Di Pauli, Ryan Haggerty, Adam Johnson, Sam Lafferty, Sam Miletic and Linus Olund and defensemen Will O’Neill, Ethan Prow and Jeff Taylor did not need to clear waivers and were sent down.

Hayes is the most accomplished player of the group, having played 334 NHL games and posting a 19-goal season with Florida in 2014-15. He opened camp with an outside shot at winning a fourth-line forward position.

The cuts leave the Penguins with 27 players on the roster. If center Riley Sheahan is back to health after a lower-body injury and nothing unexpected happens, they’ll need to cut four more before their Oct. 4 season opener against Washington.

Winger Zach Aston-Reese, defensemen Juuso Riikola and Zach Trotman and goalie Tristan Jarry are the most likely candidates to feel the ax.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at [email protected] or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.