ShareThis Page
Penguins trade for Hagelin in hopes he is long-term answer for left-wing woes |

Penguins trade for Hagelin in hopes he is long-term answer for left-wing woes

| Saturday, January 16, 2016 8:24 a.m.
Getty Images
New Penguin Carl Hagelin has four goals and eight assists in 43 games with the Ducks this season.
Getty Images
The Penguins traded for Ducks winger Carl Hagelin on Saturday, Jan. 16, 2015, sending winger David Perron and defenseman Adam Clendening to Anaheim.
The Oilers' David Perron (57) collides behind the net with the Blues' Barret Jackman as they chase the puck Nov. 28, 2014.

Like most people in sports, Penguins general manager Jim Rutherford prefers to use the term “anchor” as a positive metaphor, one reserved for the most reliable members of a team.

Left-handed winger Carl Hagelin, acquired in an early-morning trade Saturday that sent winger David Perron and defenseman Adam Clendening to Anaheim, possesses the speed and two-way skills to become a staple in the Penguins lineup, Rutherford said. But Hagelin’s contract, signed in August and worth $16 million over four seasons, could turn his “anchor” candidacy into a punch line if he underachieves and becomes little more than a $4 million-a-year salary-cap burden.

Combined, Perron ($3,812,500) and Clendening ($761,250) had a slightly greater cap hit than Hagelin, who traveled early Saturday in order to arrive in Pittsburgh in time for a 3 p.m. Sunday home game against Carolina.

“We know what we’ve got (in Hagelin),” Rutherford said. “David Perron was going to be an (unrestricted free agent). In Carl’s case, we’ve got him locked up for a few years, so that was appealing to us.

“It’s a little bit different type of player. You look at David Perron, and historically he’s roughly about a 20-goal scorer. And you look at Hagelin. He’s roughly a 15-goal scorer, with Hagelin’s plus-minus being a little bit better. So from that point of view, it all evens out. But adding that speed (from Hagelin) is going to be important for us.”

Referencing the superior career plus-minus (plus-47 in 266 games over four-plus seasons) of the 27-year-old Swede might draw snickers from some fans in the age of advanced metrics. Perron, also 27, is a minus-9 in 542 games over eight-plus seasons, but his five-on-five career rate of 1.8 points per 60 minutes trumps Hagelin’s 1.7, and both have possession numbers that indicate their teams take more than 50 percent of the shot attempts when they’re on the ice, according to

Neither impressed with their contributions through the first half of the 2015-16 season: Perron had four goals and 12 assists in 665 minutes, while Hagelin had four goals and eight assists in 645 minutes of ice time with the Ducks.

So Hagelin’s value, more than a statistical matter, comes down to his versatility. Rutherford and coach Mike Sullivan lauded Hagelin’s talents as a penalty killer and his ability to blend with high-scoring forwards and grinder lines.

Hagelin’s debut as a Penguin likely will come on a line with Evgeni Malkin and Phil Kessel.

“I think he’s going to track pucks down,” said Sullivan, who worked with the 5-foot-11, 186-pound Hagelin while both were with the New York Rangers. “He’s going to help those guys keep the puck longer. He’s going to force turnovers, put teams in vulnerable circumstances. He’s got good enough hockey sense that he can play with those guys that think the game at that level.”

Far from an oft-discussed player among the Penguins, Hagelin nonetheless joins the organization with familiarity. His 313 minutes of ice time against the Penguins is second most among his totals against all opponents, and he tallied three points with the Rangers in last season’s playoff series against the Penguins, including the series-clinching goal in overtime of Game 5.

“It’ll be nice to see him in practice a little bit and stop him,” Marc-Andre Fleury said with a chuckle.

Added winger Chris Kunitz: “I look forward to playing with him and finally having that speed on our side instead of trying to chase him down when he’s carrying the puck for other teams.”

The lack of left-handed scoring wingers beyond Kunitz — no other lefty winger had more than two goals — compelled Rutherford to look for a new weapon on the trade market. Just days before the trade, he spoke of the need for more depth at left wing.

Sergei Plotnikov, a lefty signed to a one-year deal in July, provided the promise of a scoring touch. He was just months removed from a career year in Russia’s Kontinental Hockey League, where he had 21 assists and 15 goals in 56 games.

With just two assists and no goals in 32 games, Plotnikov emerged as a bigger question mark than an answer for the Penguins’ scoring woes. Under Sullivan, he became a regular healthy scratch.

And Rutherford believes Conor Sheary, Scott Wilson and Tom Kuhnhackl, all left-handed forwards who’ve bounced between Wilkes-Barre/Scranton, aren’t ready to fill the role that now belongs to Hagelin.

“It’s just a matter of time before (Wilson) is a regular here,” Rutherford said of the Baby Pens’ and American Hockey League’s goals leader (19). “But when you look at our left side, we don’t have a lot of experience. (Hagelin) is a guy that should be able to kind of anchor the left side.”

While the addition of Hagelin might minimize opportunities for some of Baby Pens wingers to learn where they stand in the NHL, the departure of Clendening created an opportunity for defenseman Derrick Pouliot, who turned 22 on Saturday, to possibly ascend to the big-league club sooner than later.

Pouliot, the No. 8 pick overall in the 2012 draft, had six goals and 17 assists in 36 games with Wilkes-Barre/Scranton.

“It doesn’t mean he’ll come immediately, but certainly it opens the door that he gets here quicker,” Rutherford said of Pouliot, who appeared in 34 games with the Penguins last season. “His play has been good. His development, what he’s been going through has been good for him. It’s just a matter of time before we get him back up here.”

Bill West is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @BWest_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.