ShareThis Page
Penguins’ wingers: Replacing Patric Hornqvist a tough task in Game 4 |

Penguins’ wingers: Replacing Patric Hornqvist a tough task in Game 4

Kevin Gorman
| Wednesday, April 18, 2018 1:18 p.m
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Patric Hornqvist goes at it with the Flyers' Nolan Patrick in the second period Friday during round one game two of the Stanley Cup Playoffs April 13, 2018 at PPG Paints Arena.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Zach Aston-Reese watches his deflection beat Kings goaltender Jonathan Quick in the third period Tuesday, Feb. 5, 2018 at PPG Paints Arena.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Bryan Rust fights for the puck with the Flyers' Brandon Manning in the first period Sunday, March 25, 2018 at PPG Paints Arena.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins' Conor Sheary fights for the puck with the Hurricanes' Trevor van Riemsdyk in the first period Tuesday, Jan. 23, 2018 at PPG Paints Arena.

PHILADELPHIA – Patric Hornqvist has established himself as an irreplaceable player for the Penguins, not only as a net-front presence and puck retriever on the power play but as an aggressive agitator.

With Hornqvist day-to-day with an injury and out for Game 4 of the first-round playoff series against the Flyers Wednesday night at Wells Fargo Center, the Penguins are hoping their wingers can chip in to cover for his absence.

“Listen, Horny’s a real good player for us. He’s a unique player for us. He brings a certain skill set to our power play and five-on-five, but we still have very capable guys,” Penguins coach Mike Sullivan said of Hornqvist, who scored 49 points and 29 goals, including a team-high 15 power-play goals this season, and has one goal and two assists in the Flyers series. “I believe that our power play still has the ability to be successful in the absence of a player like Horny.

“We’ve got capable guys. We have to make sure that we execute, that we stick to the game plan, that we make good decisions and that we do the little things: we hunt pucks, we retrieve, we get someone in front of the net, we try to take the goalies’ eyes away, we’re willing to shoot the puck in the right areas of the rink.

“As long as we can do that, our power play will be successful.”

Where Jake Guentzel is expected to move up to the first-team power play, rookie Dominik Simon appears to be the choice to play alongside Guentzel and center Sidney Crosby on the top line.

“He’s unbelievable player. So much respect for the guy,” said Simon, who is expected to make his Stanley Cup playoffs debut. “It’s going to be tough, but I’ll do my best to do the work and help my team.”

The Penguins’ wingers are careful about not trying to emulate Hornqvist, whose play in the crease helped him score the game-winning goal in Game 6 of the Stanley Cup Final. But, to a man, they believe they can play bigger roles against the Flyers.

“He’s really an important key to this team and our success,” Zach Aston-Reese said. “He’s an agitator and I think opponents kind of hate playing against him, so I think it’s important that everyone try (not) to go outside their role but try to add a little bit of that element to their game.”

Bryan Rust said the key is to “play hard, play gritty, get to the net and get in front of the goalies’ eyes” – things Hornqvist does well – and to “bring that energy and bring that passion that he always brings.”

Added Conor Sheary: “No one is going to try to play like Horny. He’s kind of a unique player that is hard to find in this league. There’s going to be guys playing more minutes and stepping into bigger roles. I think that’s important that those guys embrace that and take that in stride.”

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @KGorman_Trib.

Kevin Gorman is a Tribune-Review sports columnist. You can contact Kevin by email at or via Twitter .

Categories: Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.