Penguins’ woes in Metropolitan Division trouble GM Rutherford |

Penguins’ woes in Metropolitan Division trouble GM Rutherford

Chaz Palla | Trib Total Media
Penguins general manager Jim Rutherford speaks in September 2014 at Consol Energy Center.
Chaz Palla | Trib Total Media
The Penguins' Evgeni Malkin plays against the Lightning, Friday, Jan. 2, 2015 at Consol Enrgy Center.

With less than two weeks until the NHL trade deadline, Penguins general manager Jim Rutherford has come to a few conclusions.

The Penguins are not good enough against Metropolitan Division opponents. Whether it’s because of line matching or inconsistency from other players, Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin have been shut down at times. And the Penguins don’t have a sufficient answer for when that happens.

“We’re getting into the period where names are going to surface and teams are going to get serious,” Rutherford told Trib Total Media. “If it’s a guy who’s capable of scoring a big goal, I would like to get that guy because if Sid and Geno get shut down, we need to be able to win games with our third and fourth lines.”

The Penguins are 7-10-4 against division opponents, 2-6-2 in their past 10 against them and 2-7-2 against possible playoff opponents in the Islanders, Rangers and Capitals. They’ve been outscored 64-46 in 21 games but 41-20 by the Islanders, Rangers and Capitals.

Crosby has six goals and seven assists over 20 division games. He has 13 goals and 32 assists in the 33 games he has played outside the Metropolitan. That’s a points-per-game average of 0.65 inside versus 1.22 outside the division.

Malkin has endured the same problems as teams load up to stop the Penguins’ franchise centers. He has six goals and nine assists in 19 division games or 0.79 points per game. That gives him 15 goals, 38 points and a 1.15 points-per-game average outside the division.

“That’s what teams try to do to us: They try to shut (Crosby and Malkin) guys down,” Rutherford said. “If they shut those guys down, and you don’t have enough balance on your third and fourth line where you can score periodically, then you can’t win.”

How will that happen? Well, there are a few parts.

• First, Rutherford is pleased with how his current group of defensemen has been playing, and the return of Christian Ehrhoff will only help.

Rookie Derrick Pouliot “continues to progress nicely.” Rutherford also believes Robert Bortuzzo’s game has improved of late.

“Based on the guys who are out there on defense, I’m not sure that we’re getting somebody who can necessarily do a better job than what we have — if we’re healthy,” Rutherford said.

• There remains a concern with the Penguins’ front office about Steve Downie’s penchant for taking third-period penalties. Downie also is a pending unrestricted free agent who carries a $1 million cap hit — one of the bigger numbers among the team’s bottom-six forwards.

Mathematically and logistically, that could squeeze Downie out of a job.

• In acquiring forward help, Rutherford remains steadfast in not wanting to part with the organization’s defense prospects: Pouliot, Scott Harrington and Brian Dumoulin.

No deals are imminent, Rutherford said, and a large part will hinge on what happens when Ehrhoff returns. But there’s no hiding the fact that getting more scoring punch from the group of top-nine forwards is a priority — not necessarily the defensemen many had the Penguins pegged to.

But coach Mike Johnston also isn’t letting Crosby and Malkin off the hook, even if six of the Penguins’ 46 divisional goals have been scored by players currently cast in bottom-six roles.

“The guys around them have to help and alleviate some of that pressure,” Johnston said. “It’s also the responsibility of those players now. It’s a big challenge. They have to accept the challenge.”

Jason Mackey is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @Mackey_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.