Pens’ Pouliot cited for public drunkenness |

Pens’ Pouliot cited for public drunkenness

Jonathan Bombulie

WILKES-BARRE — Penguins prospect Derrick Pouliot has been cited for public drunkenness.

Wilkes-Barre City police cited Pouliot early Sunday morning, according to a police report. Officers responded to a verbal dispute between Pouliot and a taxi driver about an unpaid fare at 1:10 a.m. at Hazle and Gilligan streets and found the 21-year-old defenseman to be intoxicated, police said. Pouliot was taken to the police station and issued a non-traffic citation. He was released to a sober adult, according to the report.

Pouliot could not be reached for comment. Penguins spokesman Tom McMillan referred comment to Wilkes-Barre/Scranton Penguins CEO Jeff Barrett.

“We’re aware of the situation. It’s an unfortunate circumstance,” Barrett said. “We will not comment further until we have full knowledge of all the details.”

Pouliot did not play in Wilkes-Barre/Scranton’s game against the St. John’s Ice Caps on Wednesday night.

Baby Pens coach Mike Sullivan said earlier Wednesday that Pouliot would be held out because of a bruise suffered in practice the day before.

“I can’t give any details about punishment until all the facts have surfaced,” Barrett said.

Wilkes-Barre police Lt. Joseph Novak said people ages 21 and older who are cited with public drunkenness typically face a fine and are not required to appear in court. He did not elaborate on how much that fine would be.

Jonathan Bombulie is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter at @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.