ShareThis Page
Rossi: Late-game moves pay off |

Rossi: Late-game moves pay off

| Saturday, May 18, 2013 11:21 p.m
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins’ Brandon Sutter plays against the Senators on Friday, May 17, 2013, at Consol Energy Center.

Brandon Sutter is not alone.

Most of the Penguins expect the Ottawa Senators to reach deep in Game 3 of a second-round Stanley Cup playoff series Sunday at Scotiabank Place.

After all, these Senators played most of the regular season without their three best players — defenseman Erik Karlsson, center Jason Spezza and goalie Craig Anderson — and still qualified for the playoffs.

“They’re definitely not going away,” Sutter said after a victory in Game 2 on Friday night, when the Penguins took a 2-0 lead in the best-of-seven series.

The Senators showed their disinterest in bowing out gracefully by trimming a three-goal deficit to one with 17 minutes left in regulation, then attempting 18 shots.

But the Senators managed to only get six of those attempts through against Penguins goalie Tomas Vokoun.

The Penguins, for the first time in eight games this postseason, looked a lot like the club that went on winning streaks of 15 and seven games over the final two regular-season months. They flashed the style of shutdown hockey that players had said since training camp would be required to win the Cup.

Penguins coach Dan Bylsma considered that development another sign his players have learned tough lessons from recent postseason failures.

He cited two shifts over the final four minutes by a line of Sutter and wingers Craig Adams and Pascal Dupuis.

Most interesting about those shifts is that Sutter, Adams and Dupuis all hold down regular spots on other lines. Adams is an anchor of the fourth line, Sutter the third, and Dupuis plays on the top line with captain Sidney Crosby.

A popular knock on Bylsma is that he does not make adjustments, but he never has shied away from altering lines late in games while the Penguins are protecting a lead. His preference is to play defensively responsible players together, counting on their individual own-zone awareness to create instant chemistry.

That happened late in Game 2 with the Adams-Sutter-Dupuis line.

The Senators will come hard at the Penguins in Game 3, no matter the score.

If they are down late, though, Ottawa can expect a healthy dose of Adams, Sutter and Dupuis.

The Penguins have learned from their blown leads of past playoffs, and their late-game personnel adjustments are the latest example that tough lessons are paying off.

Rob Rossi is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @RobRossi_Trib.

is a former freelancer.

Categories: Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.