ShareThis Page
Statistically, Senators’ Derick Brassard is top available target for Penguins |

Statistically, Senators’ Derick Brassard is top available target for Penguins

Jonathan Bombulie
| Thursday, February 22, 2018 3:51 p.m
Nam Y. Huh/AP
Chicago Blackhawks goalie Anton Forsberg, left, blocks a shot by Ottawa Senators center Derick Brassard during the third period of an NHL hockey game Wednesday, Feb. 21, 2018, in Chicago. The Blackhawks won 3-2.

As the Penguins’ interminable search for bottom-six center depth rolls slowly toward a conclusion — or at least a pause — it’s worth taking a moment to look at the pool of players at the position who are reportedly available before Monday’s NHL trade deadline.

Examining a few cherry-picked stats meant to give a 30,000-foot view of a player’s capabilities, Ottawa’s Derick Brassard appears to be the cream of the crop by a large margin. It’s no wonder the Senators’ asking price (a first-round pick, a top prospect and an NHL player) is reportedly so high.

Beyond that, there is a group of players that could help a team in the right circumstances and fail to move the needle if the fit is wrong.

Riley Sheahan’s numbers are included as a reference point for Penguins fans.


Riley Sheahan: 1.83

Derick Brassard: 1.81

David Desharnais: 1.74

Matt Cullen: 1.47

Jean-Gabriel Pageau: 1.39

Derek Ryan: 1.35

Tomas Plekanec: 1.31

Mark Letestu: 1.12

By this simple metric, Brassard looks good and Letestu looks bad. Everyone else is in part of the mushy middle. It fits with the eye test, too. At this stage of their careers, Brassard is still a legitimate scoring-line center, while Letestu is a fourth-liner best used to eat up some minutes when top centers aren’t on the ice. Also, Sheahan is outperforming expectations dramatically.


Derick Brassard: 5.5

Derek Ryan: 3.2

Tomas Plekanec: 0.2

Mark Letestu: -1.6

David Desharnais: -2.5

Jean-Gabriel Pageau: -3.1

Riley Sheahan: -5.5

Matt Cullen: -8.6

Another reason to consider Brassard head and shoulders above the other center candidates who might be available. He drives play significantly better than his teammates. This is a real black mark on Cullen’s record this season as well. His point-per-game numbers are actually pretty good, but this metric indicates he’s stuck in his own zone an awful lot.


Derick Brassard: 45-44

Tomas Plekanec: 28-31

Derek Ryan: 28-42

Riley Sheahan: 25-26

David Desharnais: 23-37

Matt Cullen: 22-25

Jean-Gabriel Pageau: 21-26

Mark Letestu: 13-25

Analysts with a good grasp of hockey stats will discount this stat, as it is basically the same as the much-maligned plus-minus and it’s not really a good indicator of future performance, but there’s something fundamentally useful about the bottom-line scoreboard outcome when a player is on the ice. These numbers show Brassard is not a typical two-way third-line centerman at all. He’s more exciting than that at both ends of the ice. Pageau and Plekanec look more like responsible bottom-six players by this standard. It also raises a red flag on Ryan. His points per game are good. His shot-attempt stats are good. So why has he been on the ice for 42 goals against? That would probably improve with a move to a better overall team, but what if it didn’t?


Mark Letestu: 0.12

Derick Brassard: 0.11

Jean-Gabriel Pageau: 0.05

Matt Cullen: -.03

Tomas Plekanec: -0.06

Riley Sheahan: -0.11

David Desharnais: -0.22

Derek Ryan: N/A

Real statheads would reject this number too, largely because of small sample sizes, but what the Penguins would really want more than anything in a player they acquire this late in the year is a top playoff performer. By this metric, Brassard, again, is the class of the field. It also scores points for Letestu. Fifteen points in 30 career playoff games is a pretty strong resume for a player in his role.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review NHL/Penguins reporter. You can contact Jonathan via Twitter .

Categories: Penguins
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.