ShareThis Page
Taylor Hall over Connor McDavid for NHL MVP hinges on meaning of ‘valuable’ |

Taylor Hall over Connor McDavid for NHL MVP hinges on meaning of ‘valuable’

| Thursday, June 21, 2018 1:00 p.m.
Getty Images
The Oilers' Connor McDavid skates against the Flyers on Oct. 21, 2017, in Philadelphia.

This is the first year the Professional Hockey Writers Association decided to make season-ending awards ballots public, which brings no complaints from this corner.

I take the voting process seriously. I spend some time poring over numbers before I fill out my ballot. I reflect on conversations I’ve had with players about their opinions of their peers. I try to filter out biases as best I can. This is my honest attempt at picking the best candidates for each award. No reason to hide it.

Of course, reasonable people will disagree on these matters. Feel free to register your (hopefully polite) complaints or questions via the Facebook commenting system or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.


My votes

1. Taylor Hall, NJ

2. Nathan MacKinnon, COL

3. Evgeni Malkin, PIT

4. Anze Kopitar, LA

5. Nikita Kucherov, TB

Actual results: 1. Hall; 2. MacKinnon; 3. Kopitar; 4. Claude Giroux, PHL; 5. Connor McDavid, EDM

The rationale: I feel comfortable saying McDavid was the most outstanding player in the league last season, and I could construct a definition of “most valuable” that would put him at the top of the list. Something like, “Gold has inherent value, no matter how you use it. McDavid has inherent value, no matter how far his team was out of the playoff picture.” But that sort of thinking felt too cute by half.

Traditionally, the Hart Trophy goes to a player who made valuable contributions to a successful team’s success. Someday down the road, we’re probably going to be comparing McDavid to the game’s all-time greats, and one of the metrics we’ll use is how many times he won the Hart Trophy. Until someone instructs voters otherwise, he should be held to the same standard Gretzky, Lemieux, Crosby, Ovechkin, et al have been held to all these years.

And if you’re not voting McDavid first, you can’t throw him in fourth or fifth. The definition of valuable doesn’t change further down the ballot.

Leaving McDavid off didn’t make the choice any easier. I picked Hall because he was the most consistently dangerous player I saw this season. If you’re playing the Devils, you must account for him at all times. And he helped an also-ran climb back into the playoff picture, which scores points when you’re judging on the word “valuable.” The same case could be made for MacKinnon, of course, and I might be guilty of East Coast bias by picking Hall. I assumed West Coast voters would have a similar bias in favor of MacKinnon and it would even out. Kucherov and Malkin dropped a tier due to inconsistency. Kopitar bumped Girouz from my ballot due to his two-way game.

NORRIS TROPHY (Top defenseman)

1. Victor Hedman, TB

2. Drew Doughty, LA

3. Shayne Gostisbehere, PHL

4. Roman Josi, NSH

5. Seth Jones, CBJ

Actual results: 1. Hedman; 2. Doughty; 3. P.K. Subban, NSH; 4. Jones; 5. John Carlson, WSH

The rationale: The numbers match the eye test. Hedman is the best defenseman in the game, so it felt right to vote him first for the Norris. I guess I like Gostisbehere more than most. He’s just so mobile, and in 2018, that’s the name of the game. I think Josi’s all-around game gets underrated sometimes.

CALDER TROPHY (Rookie of the year)

1. Mathew Barzal, NYI

2. Brock Boeser, VAN

3. Kyle Connor, WPG

4. Will Butcher, NJ

5. Yanni Gourde, TB

Actual results: 1. Barzal; 2. Boeser; 3. Clayton Keller, ARZ; 4. Connor; 5. Charlie McAvoy, BOS

The rationale: If Boeser didn’t get hurt, this might have been a close race, but Barzal is a magician. He deserves a trophy. Leaving Keller out of my top five might have been my biggest regret on the ballot. I just like Butcher and Gourde a lot and wanted to get them in there.

LADY BYNG TROPHY (Sportsmanship and gentlemanly play)

1. Aleksander Barkov, FLA

2. William Karlsson, VEG

3. Ryan O’Reilly, BUF

4. Marc-Eduord Vlasic, SJ

5. Henrik Zetterberg, DET

Actual results: 1. Karlsson; 2. O’Reilly; 3. Barkov; 4. Anze Kopitar, LA; 5. Jared Spurgeon, MIN

The rationale: This often comes down to who scored the most while taking the fewest penalties. I voted for Barkov because he scored a lot and took few penalties while still playing tough defense.

SELKE TROPHY (Top defensive forward)

1. Sean Couturier, PHL

2. Aleksander Barkov, FLA

3. Patrice Bergeron, BOS

4. Anze Kopitar, LA

5. Mikko Koivu, MIN

Actual results: 1. Kopitar; 2. Couturier; 3. Bergeron; 4. Barkov; 5. Koivu

The rationale: This is a tough award because it’s so impacted by reputation. Like, at this point, Bergeron could spend a year playing defense like a traffic cone and he’d still probably make my top five. So I looked at some goals against, shots against and shot attempts against numbers, balanced that with my own observations and decided on Couturier. Could have been any of the top five, really.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.