ShareThis Page
To impress Penguins, goal scoring must be part of Daniel Sprong’s game |

To impress Penguins, goal scoring must be part of Daniel Sprong’s game

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Penguins’ Daniel Sprong skate on a line with Sidney Crosby against the Blue Jackets Saturday, Sept. 22, 2018 at PPG Paints Arena.

For the past two or three years, the Pittsburgh Penguins have asked Daniel Sprong, an eminently talented shooter and the organization’s most gifted goal-scoring prospect, to work on his game away from the puck in order to become a more well-rounded player.

Here’s the way coach Mike Sullivan describes the marching orders.

“His scoring ability is evident. His ability to shoot the puck is evident. That jumps out at all of us. But there’s more to the game than just shooting the puck,” Sullivan said. “We’re trying to help Daniel with his overall game on both sides of the puck, both offensively with better understanding of how to support the puck and getting involved on forecheck and things of that nature, and defensively, his awareness away from the puck and his wall play and all those little things that are hard to quantify but add up to winning.”

Sprong has played in three preseason games so far, the first two as part of prospect-laden lineups and the third alongside Jake Guentzel and Sidney Crosby on the team’s top line.

He has no goals, an assist and five shots on goal. He’s been on the ice for two even-strength goals for and one against.

He hasn’t played poorly, and he has shown an effort at times to get back on defense, but he hasn’t had much success with the puck on his stick.

Is it possible, given his career arc, that the Penguins could be perfectly happy with his performance, even if he doesn’t score, so long as he supports his linemates well and plays responsible defense?

Yeah, probably not.

“We’d like to see him score,” Sullivan said. “That’s an area that we think is a strength of his game. That’s something we’d like to see. As a player, you can’t always control when the puck goes in the net or if it doesn’t, but you can control the process. You can control your ability to generate scoring chances and your involvement in creating opportunity. That’s really where our focus is with Daniel right now.”

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jonathan at [email protected] or via Twitter @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.