Archive

Scouting reports on new Pirates Kyle Crick, Bryan Reynolds | TribLIVE.com
Pirates/MLB

Scouting reports on new Pirates Kyle Crick, Bryan Reynolds

gtrCrick011618
San Francisco Giants pitcher Kyle Crick against the Philadelphia Phillies during a baseball game in San Francisco, Friday, Aug. 18, 2017. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)

A look at the two players the Pirates go in return for Andrew McCutchen.

Kyle Crick

Age 25

6-4/220

Throws: Right

Bio: A converted starter who was once the Giants No. 1 prospect, according to Baseball America, in 2012 and ’13 … had control problems in Double-A and was dropped to the team’s No. 27 prospect by the end of 2015 … moved to bullpen and became a presence with his 96 to 99 mph fastball … Called up to the Giants in June 2017 and finished with a 3.06 ERA in 32 13 innings and 30 games. Could be a late-inning guy to package with Felipe Rivero and newly-acquired Michael Feliz.

Bryan Reynolds

Age: 22

6- 3205

Throws: Right

6- 3205

Bio: The switch-hitter was taken in the second round of the 2016 MLB Draft from Vanderbilt … Led the 2014 ntional championship team in hitting (.338) as a freshman … ranked the Giants fifth-best prospect according to MLBPipeline.com, he has batted .312 in his two seasons as a professional … has a total of 43 doubles, 10 triples, 16 home runs and 101 RBI in 177 games of professional baseball … has a strong arm that can play center or right field … has gap power and has shown better punch from the right side … competed in the 2017 Futures Game and was named a California League all-star … has the talent to be a fast-riser through the organization.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.