PNC Park lands at No. 5 on Forbes’ list of baseball parks |

PNC Park lands at No. 5 on Forbes’ list of baseball parks

Frank Carnevale
Guy Wathen | Tribune-Review
The sun rises over PNC Park for the Pirates' opening day on Sunday, April 3, 2016.

While Pirates owner Bob Nutting and General Manager Neal Huntington are drawing the ire from fans about the state of the team, some even calling for a boycot of the team, a national publication still thinks it’s a great place to see a baseball game.

This year’s Forbes’ ranking of Major League Baseball parks places PNC Park at No.5 saying the park “has a view that might be the most stunning in all of baseball, with a view of the iconic Roberto Clemente Bridge and downtown.”

PNC Park regularly tops lists ranking baseball venues with it fan-friendly seating and grand views of Pittsburgh.

Unfortunately for Pirates fans, while the park is top-notch, the team is underwhelming. The Pirates finished fourth in the NL Central last year. And after trading away franchise players, they are not projected to compete for a playoff spot.

The Forbes list was put together by writer Maury Brown. He placed AT&T; Park in San Francisco at the top, saying “where balls hit out to right field land in McCovey Cove, it’s a gem, with great views of downtown.”

Oriole Park at Camden Yards, the stadium that kicked off the retro-modern design of stadiums, came in second. Busch Stadium in St. Louis and Dodger Stadium in Los Angeles were three and four.

The worst stadium on the list was Tropicana Field, home of the Tampa Bay Rays, in St. Petersburg. This domed venue is the only stadium on the list without a retractable roof.

Here’s the whole list.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.