Archive

Pirates minor league report: April 9, 2018 | TribLIVE.com
Pirates/MLB

Pirates minor league report: April 9, 2018

gtrminorslogosxxxxxx
gtrminorslogosxxxxxx
gtrminorslogosxxxxxx
gtrminorslogosxxxxxx
gtrminorslogosxxxxxx

INDIANAPOLIS (Triple-A, 2-1) lost 13-3 to Toledo (Tigers). CF Christopher Bostick (.500) was 3 for 4 with one run. 2B Kevin Kramer (.294) was 2 for 4 with an RBI. C Jacob Stallings (.500) recorded two RBIs. RHP Austin Coley (0-1, 81.00 ERA) lasted two-thirds of the first inning, allowing six runs on seven hits.

Next: Tuesday vs. Toledo, 7:05 p.m.

ALTOONA (Double-A, 3-1) vs. Harrisburg (Nationals) was postponed due to inclement weather. LHP Taylor Hearn is the Curve’s probable starting pitcher for Tuesday’s game

Next: Tuesday vs. Harrisburg, 6 p.m.

BRADENTON (High-A, 3-1) won 7-3 over Lakeland (Tigers). LHP Cam Vieaux (1-0, 5.40 ERA) struck out seven in five innings. RF Bligh Madris (.350) drove in four on two hits, including a third-inning two-run homer. RHP Matt Eckelman (2.70 ERA) recorded his second save this season, surrendering one hit and striking out three in 2 13 innings.

Next: Tuesday at Lakeland, 6:30 p.m.

WEST VIRGINIA (Low-A, 2-2) vs. Lakewood (Phillies) was postponed due to inclement weather. LHP Braeden Ogle and RHP Sergio Cubilete are the Power’s probable starters in Tuesday’s doubleheader.

Next: Tuesday doubleheader vs. Lakewood, 5:05 p.m.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.