ShareThis Page
Pirates’ Kyle Crick, part of Andrew McCutchen trade, recalled |

Pirates’ Kyle Crick, part of Andrew McCutchen trade, recalled

| Friday, April 13, 2018 3:18 p.m
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates pitcher Kyle Crick throws live batting practice during spring training Monday, Feb. 19, 2018, at Pirate City in Bradenton, Fla.

Two weeks into the season, the Pirates finally will get a chance to see what they got back for Andrew McCutchen.

Right-handed pitcher Kyle Crick, who came from the San Francisco Giants in January in a trade for McCutchen that also brought the Pirates minor league outfielder Bryan Reynolds and $500,000 of international signing allocation, was recalled Friday from Class AAA Indiananapolis.

The Pirates also selected the contract of right-handed pitcher Richard Rodriguez from Indianapolis.

The moves changed the face of the Pirates’ bullpen after their 9-3 start to the season and before they open a three-game series Friday night in Miami against the Marlins. To make room for Crick and Rodriguez, left-handed pitcher Josh Smoker and righty Clay Holmes were sent to Indianapolis.

The demotion of Smoker leaves closer Felipe Vasquez as the team’s only lefty in the bullpen. Lefty Steven Brault could return to long relief when Joe Musgrove is reinstated from the disabled list.

Smoker, who pitched the past two seasons for the New York Mets, allowed opponents a .474 batting average, highest among Pirates pitchers. He gave up nine hits, four runs and two walks with no strikeouts in four innings.

Holmes made only one appearance, giving up two hits, one run and two walks in two innings.

In Indianapolis, Crick was 1-0 with a 2.25 ERA, and Rodriguez made two scoreless appearances, striking out nine in five innings.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.