Archive

ShareThis Page
Francisco Cervelli (illness), Felipe Vazquez (flexor) were available to Pirates | TribLIVE.com
Pirates/MLB

Francisco Cervelli (illness), Felipe Vazquez (flexor) were available to Pirates

GTRBucs19051318
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates catcher Francisco Cervelli celebrates with closer Felipe Vazquez after defeating the Giants Saturday, May 12, 2018, at PNC Park.

Closer Felipe Vazquez and starting catcher Francisco Cervelli were available to the Pirates during Tuesday’s game after each had been out recently because of a flexor injury and flu-like symptoms, respectively.

Vazquez said felt a “pop” in his left arm and lost feeling in his ring finer during his outing Sunday , and the Pirates deemed him unavailable for Monday’s game. But after throwing off flat ground Monday, Vazquez took fielding drills and threw in the bullpen Tuesday.

Vazquez told reporters he was cleared to pitch Tuesday if called upon.

Cervelli was a late scratch from Sunday’s lineup when he fell ill . He also did not start Monday, though manager Clint Hurdle afterward said he was available in an emergency. It wasn’t until Tuesday that Cervelli was spotted in the clubhouse.

Cervelli said Tuesday he was able for starting duty “whenever they say.” But the Pirates on Tuesday started Elias Diaz for the third consecutive game.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at cadamski@tribweb.com or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.