ShareThis Page
Catcher McGuire leads prospects invited to spring training with Pirates |

Catcher McGuire leads prospects invited to spring training with Pirates

Rob Biertempfel
| Monday, January 4, 2016 4:42 p.m

Catcher Reese McGuire, one of the Pirates’ top minor leaguers, is among 12 players who on Monday received non-roster invitations to the club’s big league spring training camp.

McGuire, a first-round pick in 2013, is rated by Baseball America as the sixth-best prospect in the Pirates’ farm system. He batted .254 with 15 doubles and 34 RBI in 98 games last year with High-A Bradenton.

Other players who got invites are pitchers Steven Brault, Jim Fuller, Chad Kuhl, Kelvin Marte and Trevor Williams; infielders Juan Diaz, Adam Frazier and Dan Gamache; catchers Ed Easley and Jacob Stallings; and outfielder Antoan Richardson.

Non-roster invitees are usually long shots to make the team out of spring training. For elite talent such as McGuire, who likely will begin this season at Double-A Altoona, an invite is a chance to get acclimated with the major-league atmosphere before heading back to the minors.

The Pirates will have 17 non-roster players in camp. Pitchers and catchers will hold their first workout Feb. 19 in Bradenton, Fla. The first full-squad workout is set for Feb. 23.

Rob Biertempfel is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @BiertempfelTrib.

Categories: Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.