ShareThis Page
Gameday: Pirates vs. Tigers, April 13, 2015 |

Gameday: Pirates vs. Tigers, April 13, 2015

Travis Sawchik
| Sunday, April 12, 2015 10:24 p.m

Pirates vs. Tigers

1:35 p.m.

PNC Park

TV/radio: Root Sports/ 93.7 FM, 1450 AM, 1480 AM, Pirates Radio Network

Probable pitchers: Pirates RHP Gerrit Cole (0-0, 5.40) vs. Tigers RHP Anibal Sanchez (1-0, 0.00)

Next up

7:05 p.m. Tuesday: Pirates RHP A.J. Burnett (0-0, 3.38) vs. Tigers RHP Shane Greene (1-0, 0.00)

7:05 p.m. Wednesday: Pirates LHP Francisco Liriano (0-0, 2.57) vs. Tigers RHP Alfredo Simon (1-0, 4.06)

Did you know?

• The Pirates host a red-hot Tigers team that enters having won their first six games outscoring their opponents 47-16. The good news for the Pirates is they will miss Tigers ace David Price, whom the Pirates tried to acquire before last summer’s trade deadline.

• Only two Tigers batters have faced Gerrit Cole. Yoenis Cespedes singled once in three at bats vs. Cole, and Ian Kinsler is 0 for 3.

Stats of the day

51 Home wins by the Pirates last season, a PNC Park record and most in franchise history since 1992.

87 Days since Pirates manager Clint Hurdle was in Pittsburgh. Hurdle left for Bradenton, Fla., on Jan. 15.

He said it …

“I’m going to frame it.”

— Red Sox pitcher Clay Buchholz on a warning letter, printed on stationery from the commissioner’s office, regarding his violation of pace of play rules by stepping out of the batter’s box.

Categories: Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.