ShareThis Page
Pirates’ attempts to bolster roster at deadline a fruitless endeavor |

Pirates’ attempts to bolster roster at deadline a fruitless endeavor

Rob Biertempfel
| Thursday, July 31, 2014 10:33 a.m

PHOENIX — A star-studded day of dealing around the majors ended with a thud for the Pirates.

They made a solid bid for Jon Lester. They made a push for David Price. They looked into John Lackey. The Pirates also mulled possible trades for a host of relief pitchers and bench players.

When the non-waiver trade deadline passed at 4 p.m. Thursday, the Pirates had made zero deals.

“We were engaged on a ton of fronts,” general manager Neal Huntington said. “We wanted to add to this club. … But, at the end of the day, we felt the right move was no move.”

The two other clubs clustered with the Pirates near the top of the NL Central, the Brewers and the Cardinals, made trades. The Brewers got outfielder Gerardo Parra for two prospects. One day after adding pitcher Justin Masterson, the Cardinals picked up Lackey.

Huntington always has been inclined to hoard his best minor league players, and this year was no different. However, many of the biggest trades Thursday involved teams swapping major leaguers.

“It was interesting that the majority of impact major league players went for major league talent or guys who were young major league players,” Huntington said. “It was kind of an NBA environment, where it was established guys (dealt) for younger established guys versus a market where (GMs) were grabbing the best prospects they possibly can.”

Huntington still can swing a deal or two in August, as he did last year to get Marlon Byrd and Justin Morneau. However, any player acquired from this point on first will have to clear waivers.

Things got off to a disappointing start Thursday morning when the Pirates’ top target — Lester, the Red Sox ace — was dealt to the Oakland Athletics. The Red Sox also gave up outfielder Jonny Gomes and received All-Star center fielder Yoenis Cespedes, cash and a draft pick.

Less than a year after winning the World Series, the Red Sox are retooling their roster and adding depth to their farm system. Yet by getting Cespedes instead of a package of prospects for Lester, Boston still could be poised to make another deep playoff run before slugger David Ortiz, 38, ends his career.

Lackey, one of Lester’s mates in Boston, was dealt to the Cardinals for a pair of big leaguers: outfielder Allen Craig and pitcher Joe Kelly.

Late in the day, the Pirates jumped into the fray for Price. The Tigers won that battle, getting Price as part of a three-way deal with the Rays and the Mariners. Four of the five players involved are already in the big leagues.

One Pirates prospect frequently mentioned in talks was outfielder Josh Bell, a second-round pick with a nice swing and good power potential. However, Bell was promoted to Double-A Altoona just two weeks ago and might not reach the majors for another three years.

Boston, like several other teams, had interest in left fielder Starling Marte, who soon should be activated from the seven-day concussion disabled list.

After signing Marte to a six-year, $31 million contract in March, the Pirates were not motivated to move him, especially for a two-month rental player such as Lester.

One source indicated there was little interest from other clubs in Pirates third baseman Pedro Alvarez. Defensive issues and batting funks have reduced Alvarez to essentially a platoon player in recent weeks.

“We like the foundation of our rotation, bullpen and position players,” Huntington said. “We’re still going to look to see what we can add and how we can add to it. We’ve got some guys who are getting healthy. And we’ve got some guys in Triple-A who we think are on the verge of being able to help us.”

Rob Biertempfel is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @BiertempfelTrib.

Categories: Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.