Pirates’ McCutchen 3rd in NL MVP voting |

Pirates’ McCutchen 3rd in NL MVP voting

Getty Images
The Pirates' Andrew McCutchen hits a double against the Phillies during the sixth inning Thursday, Sept. 11, 2014, in Philadelphia.
Christopher Horner | Trib Total Media
Pirates center fielder Andrew McCutchen finished behind the Dodgers' Clayton Kershaw and the Marlins' Giancarlo Stanton in the NL MVP race.

Pirates center fielder Andrew McCutchen put together another MVP-caliber season in 2014, but Los Angeles Dodgers pitcher Clayton Kershaw had a season for ages.

One day after unanimously winning his third National League Cy Young Award, Kershaw on Thursday dethroned McCutchen as the NL’s Most Valuable Player.

Miami Marlins outfielder Giancarlo Stanton, who led the league with 37 home runs, finished second in the voting with 298 points and eight first-place votes.

McCutchen got 271 points, including four first-place votes.

“Congratulations to Clayton Kershaw on winning the 2014 National League MVP,” McCutchen said in a statement released via Twitter. “He had a legendary season and is very deserving of the award. It was an honor to have been a finalist for the award for the third consecutive year.

“There were some ups and downs throughout the year, and this season became a great test for me as a ballplayer.”

Despite a rib injury that sent him to the disabled list for the first time in his career, McCutchen posted final numbers that were in line with his MVP-winning performance in 2013.

McCutchen led the majors with a .401 on-base percentage and topped the NL with a .952 OPS. He finished third in the league with a .314 batting average and was tied for eighth with 25 home runs.

Pirates third baseman Josh Harrison finished ninth in the voting with 52 points. Catcher Russell Martin was 13th with 21 points.

Rob Biertempfel is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @BiertempfelTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.