Pirates pitcher Chad Kuhl sent to disabled list; Max Moroff recalled from Indianapolis |

Pirates pitcher Chad Kuhl sent to disabled list; Max Moroff recalled from Indianapolis

Getty Images
Pirates starting pitcher Chad Kuhl throws during the second inning against the Brewers on Tuesday.

The Pirates placed Chad Kuhl on the 10-day disabled list Friday (retroactive to Wednesday), possibly signaling the return of Nick Kingham to the starting rotation.

Kuhl, who was scheduled to pitch Monday against the Los Angeles Dodgers, left his most recent start after four innings Wednesday with a right forearm strain.

“It will be no-throw for a while (for Kuhl),” Pirates manager Clint Hurdle said Friday night on 93.7 FM, “and we will figure it out from there.”

Kuhl is 5-5, with a 4.55 ERA. He has lasted two and four innings in his past two starts, allowing a total of 11 hits (two homers), 10 runs and three walks. For the season, he has thrown seven wild pitches.

Kingham could be the choice to pitch Monday. The Indians already have a replacement for Kingham, calling up top prospect Mitch Keller from Double-A Altoona. Keller will pitch for the Indians against Columbus on Saturday.

Losing Kuhl allowed the Pirates to call up middle infielder Max Moroff from Triple-A Indianapolis to replace Sean Rodriguez, who is also on the disabled list (quad).

Moroff was with the Pirates earlier this season when second baseman Josh Harrison was injured. In 16 games and 37 at-bats with the Pirates, Moroff is hitting .216 with two home runs.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.