Plethora of new tools shows analytics’ growth in MLB |

Plethora of new tools shows analytics’ growth in MLB

Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates players have been wearing sensors that track their heart rate and calories burned during work-outs and games at spring training in Bradenton, Fla.

On-base percentage? That market inefficiency was 2003.

Defensive shifts? That edge was so 2013.

The age of information, of silicon, has had a profound influence on Major League Baseball. And as teams search for inefficiencies in the market place, for competitive advantages in the sphere of analytics, they are having to become more creative. They are having to dig deeper and deeper.

Still, that doesn’t mean the value of analytics has peaked. Some could argue its importance is still in its early stages. New tools and data keep pouring into the game.

Pirates utility player Cole Figueroa, who writes his own computer code, believes players, many once resistant to analytics, will begin embracing the field more when new technologies and ideas become more accessible, more “tangible.”

“I think that is where the game is going,” Figueroa said. “There is technology that helps track swing planes and really can help players adjust their game to what is most optimal.”

At an organizational level, perhaps the greatest opportunity for a competitive advantage related to analytics is injury prevention.

For example, Pirates manager Clint Hurdle said last spring that the Pirates’ curiosity was sparked by reading about how the Golden State Warriors reduced players’ minutes in the season 2014-15 and enjoyed a spike in player efficiency en route to an NBA title.

In 2015, the Pirates’ starters played five or fewer games per week 65 percent of the time, according to Baseball Prospectus. The major league average was 72 percent.

A year after Russell Martin was spotted wearing a Zephyr Bioharness in the spring training clubhouse, a wearable technology that monitors energy expenditure and heart rate, roughly a third of all Pirates were using the device last season. The Pirates also monitored players’ steps on the field thanks to perhaps the sport’s greatest big data tool to date.

The Pirates lost the second-least value to the disabled list last season, -2.5 WAR, according to

This spring, the Pirates hired James Harris, who worked under former Philadelphia Eagles coach Chip Kelly, to play a role in nutrition practices.

“We are going to have to find new ways to impact these guys and help them grow,” Pirates general manager Neal Huntington said.

There was objective science going into determining when to rest players.

The pitch-tracking system PITCHf/x jumped the number for data points from the tens of thousands to the tens of millions when it was installed in every major league ballpark in 2008 and began giving analysts new tools like a pitch movement, uniform velocity and pitch location. And Major League Baseball’s StatCast player-tracking system went online last season. The sport’s data points per season now number in the billions.

Teams soon will have a better handle on defensive performance as traits like range, first-step quickness, route efficiency and arm strength and accuracy as they are objectively measured for the first time. There are new meaningful tools, like exit velocity, to evaluate hitters. (Andrew McCutchen’s exit velocity was down last spring, but jumped in the summer when he was healthy.)

As baseball enters 2016, the age of analytics perhaps is closer to its beginning than its end.

Travis Sawchik is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @Sawchik_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.