Report: Greg Brown the losingest current MLB play-by-play announcer |

Report: Greg Brown the losingest current MLB play-by-play announcer

Doug Gulasy
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates broadcaster Greg Brown sits in the Root Sports booth Tuesday, July 9, 2013, before the Pirates game against the Oakland Athletics at the PNC Park.

Greg Brown’s “Raise the Jolly Roger!” victory cry ranks as perhaps the most signature call during his long tenure as Pirates play-by-play announcer on television and radio.

Yet more often than not, the Jolly Roger has remained lowered during his time calling games.

A report by Minnesota-based Bring Me the News , analyzing the win-loss record of the 30 current Major League Baseball television play-by-play announcers, placed Brown with 2,133 called losses in his 25 seasons as broadcaster — more than any other. The Minnesota Twins’ Dick Bremer ranks second-best — or is it second-worst? — with 2,031 in the same number of seasons.

Per the report, Brown also has called 1,774 victories for a winning percentage of .454, ranking 28th, ahead of the Padres’ Dan Orsillo (.417) and the Marlins’ Paul Severino (.409).

A member of the Pirates organization since 1979, Brown began calling games in 1994, the second year of what became a streak of 20 losing seasons.

Given that Brown splits time between television and radio, of course, he technically wouldn’t rank as the losingest current TV play-by-play man.

But who’s counting?

Doug Gulasy is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Doug at [email protected] or via Twitter @dgulasy_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.