Archive

ShareThis Page
Scouting report for Monday, May 1: Pirates at Reds | TribLIVE.com
Pirates/MLB

Scouting report for Monday, May 1: Pirates at Reds

Tribune-Review
| Sunday, April 30, 2017 7:24 p.m
GTRBucs03042617
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates pitcher Gerrit Cole throws during the sixth inning against the Cubs Tuesday, April 25, 2017, at PNC Park.
gtrAmirGarrett050117
MLB Photos via Getty Images
GOODYEAR, AZ - FEBRUARY 18: Amir Garrett #50 of the Cincinnati Reds poses during Photo Day on Saturday, February 18, 2017 at Goodyear Ballpark in Goodyear, Arizona. (Photo by Robert Binder/MLB Photos via Getty Images) *** Local Caption *** Amir Garrett

PIRATES GAMEDAY

at Reds

7:10 p.m.

Great American Ball Park, Cincinnati

TV/radio: Root Sports/93.7 FM, Pirates Radio Network

Probable pitchers

Pirates RHP Gerrit Cole (1-3, 3.60) vs. Reds RHP Amir Garrett (2-2, 5.09)

Gamecast: The Reds have owned Cole, who’s gone 0-6 with a 5.44 ERA in eight career starts against them. Five of those outings were at GABP, where Cole is 0-3 with a 4.55 ERA. … Scooter Gennett has gone 8 for 17 (.471) against Cole, but has never driven in a run against him. The Reds’ biggest run-producer vs. Cole is not Joey Votto (two RBI in 15 at-bats), but Eugenio Suarez (three RBI in seven at-bats). … Garrett began him MLB career by tossing 12 straight scoreless innings over his first two starts. David Freese ended that run with a two-run homer in the seventh inning on April 12 at PNC Park. … So far this season, eight Reds have made their MLB debuts. … Rookie pitchers have started 175 of the Reds past 348 games (50.3 percent), including a club-record 110 games in 2015.

Next up

Tuesday, 7:10 p.m.: Pirates RHP Tyler Glasnow (0-1, 7.98) vs. Reds RHP Scott Feldman (1-2, 3.25)

Categories: Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.