ShareThis Page
Scouting report: Pirates vs. Astros; Monday, Aug. 22, 2016 |

Scouting report: Pirates vs. Astros; Monday, Aug. 22, 2016

Rob Biertempfel
| Sunday, August 21, 2016 5:42 p.m
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates pitcher Jameson Taillon throws during the second inning against the Padres on Thursday, Aug. 11, 2016, at PNC Park.
Astros starter Doug Fister


vs. Astros

7:05 p.m.

PNC Park

TV/radio: Root Sports/93.7 FM, 1450 AM, 1480 AM, Pirates Radio Network

Probable pitchers

RHP DOUG FISTER (11-8, 3.76) vs. Pirates RHP JAMESON TAILLON (3-2, 3.00)

Gamecast: Taillon has posted quality starts in each of his past seven outings, and in nine of 11 overall. … This is the only the second interleague series between the teams and the Astros’ first visit to PNC Park since 2013. The Pirates have won 14 of the past 19 meetings overall.

Next up

Tuesday, 7:05 p.m.: Astros RHP Joe Musgrove (1-1, 4.18) vs. Pirates RHP Ivan Nova (9-6, 4.83) … In his big league debut, Musgove tossed 4.1 scoreless innings vs. the Blue Jays. His eight strikeouts tied a major league record for most by a reliever in his first game.

Wednesday, 12:35 p.m.: Astros RHP Collin McHugh (7-10, 4.99 ERA) vs. Pirates RHP Gerrit Cole (7-8, 3.30) … Over his past five starts, McHugh is 0-4 with a 9.00 ERA and a .381 BAA.

He said it …

“We threw a flag on him for hogging the ball.” — Clint Hurdle, making a joking reference to RHP Chad Kuhl’s ability to make superb defensive plays.

The closer

On Saturday, the Astros parlayed six two-run innings into a 12-2 win vs. the Orioles. Per Elias, it’s the first time since 1967 that a team has scored at least a dozen runs in a game with nothing but two-run innings.

Categories: Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.