ShareThis Page
Stats Corner: Production from Pirates’ 1st basemen has bottomed out |

Stats Corner: Production from Pirates’ 1st basemen has bottomed out

| Sunday, March 30, 2014 12:01 a.m

First base is hallowed ground in Pirates history. It’s the position from which Willie Stargell clubbed 180 of his franchise record 475 home runs, and it’s also the spot where barrel-chested sluggers like Dick Stuart and Bob Robertson instilled fear into pitchers. Lately, however, first base has been a black hole for the Bucs — and it might not get much better in 2014.

Over the past decade, no National League team has received less production from its first basemen than the Pirates. They rank 27th in the majors since 2004 in Wins Above Replacement (WAR), which measures a player’s offensive, defensive and baserunning value compared to a waiver wire-type talent. At the spot where Pops once towered, the Bucs have racked up just a third of the average WAR produced by MLB teams.

Lowest 1B WAR in MLB

Team1B WAR, 2004-13






Team Avg. from 2004-1322.4


The highlight of the barren decade was Adam LaRoche’s 1.9 WAR campaign in 2007. Lyle Overbay (-1.0 WAR in 2011) and Brad Eldred (-0.8 WAR in 2005), meanwhile, inflicted more damage on the Bucs’ chances of winning than opposing pitchers. The last regular Pirates first baseman to enjoy a truly outstanding season was Kevin Young, who had 5.3 WAR in 1999.

While the Pirates were connected to every first baseman thought to be available this winter — Mike Carp, Ike Davis, Kendrys Morales and Mitch Moreland among them — they figure to rely upon a low-key platoon of Gaby Sanchez and Travis Ishikawa to end the team’s dry spell. Sanchez thumps lefties (career .895 on-base-plus slugging percentage). Ishikawa’s work against righties is less promising, though. The 30-year-old minor league free-agent signee posted an .872 OPS versus right-handers in Triple-A last year, but holds a mere .737 career mark in the majors.

David Golebiewski is a freelance writer.

Categories: Pirates
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.