Surging Felipe Vazquez unavailable Tuesday, leading to Pirates’ committee closer |

Surging Felipe Vazquez unavailable Tuesday, leading to Pirates’ committee closer

After pitching each of the previous three days, Felipe Vazquez was deemed unavailable to the Pirates for Tuesday night’s game.

So who was manager Clint Hurdle intending to turn to in a save situation? He wasn’t going to – to use his own parlance – “overcook” considering it.

“Sometimes you spend so much time and preparation, and then the game starts and it all breaks loose,” Hurdle said before Tuesday’s game against the Washington Nationals. “And sometimes that’s kind of comforting because some decisions are eliminated or made for you. If a starter gets knocked out in the first or second inning, now the whole complexion of the game changes.

“That what makes it interesting and that’s when you find more about yourself and your comfort zone and about your players and how they adapt and overcome, as well.”

Kyle Crick (11 consecutive scoreless appearances) is the top candidate as the closer-for-a-day, though Hurdle suggested that a spate of tough lefties up in the ninth inning could, in theory, compel him to turn to lefthander Steven Brault. Hurdle mentioned how he recently turned to Tyler Glasnow in a high-leverage eighth-inning role, for example.

Hurdle pointed out the mental aspect of pitching the ninth, and he complimented Vazquez for bouncing back from adversity this season to make the National League All-star roster .

After allowing 12 baserunners and two home runs in seven spring-training innings, Vazquez imploded on opening day, allowing four runs in 2/3 of an inning. He recovered from that nicely – 16 of his next 17 outings were scoreless – before a stretch of blown saves in three consecutive late-May appearances.

But, again, Vazquez bounced back: he has been scored upon just once in his last 15 outings (including the past 11 in a row) while converting each of his last nine save chances.

“I just appreciated the way he was able to pull back, reassess, honestly self evaluate and get a program back in place he thought can work,” Hurdle said, “to start to incrementally work his way back one thing at a time and sharpen up a bit. I really appreciated the way he went about it and the fight he showed in getting back.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.