ShareThis Page
Three things we learned from Pirates since trade deadline |

Three things we learned from Pirates since trade deadline

Starling Marte’s batting average has dropped 15 points — from .292 to .277 — this month.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates right fielder Gregory Polanco flies out during the sixth inning against the Cardinals Sunday, Aug. 5, 2018, at PNC Park.

The Pittsburgh Pirates have faced so many season-defining stretches this season that there’s nothing wrong with throwing another on the fire.

Fire? Good choice of words. The Pirates may have torched their playoff hopes by merely treading water (win one, lose one) in recent series against the New York Mets, Chicago Cubs and San Francisco Giants. They also lost two of three — at home — to the St. Louis Cardinals.

Worse, the Mets and Giants are not good teams.

With 43 games to play, the Pirates (61-58) are five games behind the Milwaukee Brewers, who hold the second wild-card berth in the National League.

Please, let’s forget the Central Division championship. Eight games is too much ground to make up on the Cubs in 43 games, especially when you consider these metrics:

If the Cubs, inexplicably and in some fans’ fantasy world, lost 23 of their final 45, they’d still have 90 victories. To beat that, the Pirates would have to finish 30-13, a .698 winning percentage. That’s better than their impressive 21-10 stretch that ended with the loss in San Francisco on Sunday.

And the Cubs won’t lose more than they win over the final seven weeks of the season, so put that thought out of your head.

The Pirates play nine games in the next nine days, starting Tuesday in Minnesota. Then, the Cubs visit PNC Park for four and the Atlanta Braves — a wild-card contender — come in for three. Anything less than 7-2 won’t do.

Here are three trends that have emerged in the past two weeks since the trading deadline that made the Pirates an unlikely playoff qualifier:

What’s wrong with Starling Marte?

Probably nothing, but — admit it — your hopes were raised last month when he hit six home runs and drove in 16 runs in a 14-game stretch. Since then, he has one homer and three RBIs, and his batting average has fallen from .292 to .277.

Marte is the Pirates’ most gifted player — he’s one of the league’s best center fielders — but they need his bat just as desperately as his glove.

2. Trading for Chris Archer and Keone Kela were the right moves, but …

The Pirates are 2-0 in Archer’s two starts, but that’s the point. He has been with the team for 10 games, but for eight of them, he was just another guy on the bench. The team is only 5-5 in that time.

It’s not his fault. He’s a starting pitcher and they work only every fifth day. What is troubling, though, are the six walks and two home runs he’s surrendered in 9 1/3 innings.

Kela has been just short of brilliant, pitching five innings in five games and allowing no runs and only four base runners (three hits and one walk), with six strikeouts.

But the Pirates are only 3-2 when he pitches, losing 2-1 and 4-3 decisions when the bats and gloves failed.

The Pirates need more than what two significant trades could offer.

3. Gregory Polanco’s power fizzle

The Pirates right fielder has done a remarkable job pulling his batting average off the floor — from .200 to .242 in less than two months — but it’s not enough.

He leads the Pirates in home runs (19), but he hasn’t hit one in August. No one expected him to keep up his productive July when he hit eight, a pace of 48 for the season. But the Pirates lost three games this month by one- or two-run deficits. He was 0 for 11 in those games.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at [email protected] or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.