Tim Benz: A bad look for Joe Maddon … and the Pirates |

Tim Benz: A bad look for Joe Maddon … and the Pirates

Tim Benz
Chicago Cubs' Anthony Rizzo (44) is greeted by manager Joe Maddon, left, as he returns to the dugout after hitting a solo home run off Pirates relief pitcher Edgar Santana during the seventh inning of a baseball game in Pittsburgh, Tuesday, May 29, 2018.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
The Cubs' Anthony Rizzo connects on a double in front of Pirates catcher Elias Diaz during the first inning Tuesday, May 29, 2018, at PNC Park.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Pirates manager Clint Hurdle greets catcher Elias Diaz at the dugout after Diaz hit a home run during the second inning against the Cubs Tuesday, May 29, 2018, at PNC Park.

The Pirates looked bad Tuesday. Again.

So did Cubs manager Joe Maddon. Again.

For those who wanted the Bucs to throw at Anthony Rizzo to even the score for his takeout slide of catcher Elias Diaz on Monday, they really didn’t. A Michael Feliz pitch in the dirt nearly hit Rizzo’s foot on ball four in the eighth inning with Chicago up 8-4. That’s as close as they came to plunking Pittsburgh’s newest sports villain.

By that point, Rizzo had already homered and been given an intentional walk with first base open and two outs.

Instead they just tried to pitch effectively. That didn’t work out so well either, as the Cubs scored those eight runs on 14 hits against six Pirates pitchers.

One of the position players who had some positive moments for the Pirates was Diaz. He hit a home run and threw out Jayson Heward trying to steal second base early in the game.

If it had been me, after homering, I probably would’ve looked right at Maddon in the dugout grabbed my crotch and spit.

No. Wait. Roseanne Barr did that once. No one wants to be associated with her right about now.

OK, maybe I would’ve pulled a Justin Verlander and simply given a sarcastic cap-tip .

Diaz was more professional and calmly went back to the dugout.

“I’m grateful (the home run) got out,” Diaz said through interpreter Mike Gonzalez. “I enjoyed it the same way I enjoyed any home run. But my goal today was just to play good baseball.”

I wonder what Maddon thought about Diaz’s technique in either of those situations. He certainly had plenty negative to say about Diaz’s form earlier in the day, in essence blaming him for Rizzo’s slide occurring in the first place.

After that game, Maddon suggested Diaz needed to clear out from home plate more before throwing his potential double play ball up the first base line prior to contact from Rizzo.

Based on the photo, it looks like Diaz is as close to the grass as he is to home plate. How much further should he clear out, Joe? To the pitcher’s mound?

Nonetheless, Maddon doubled down on Tuesday before the game.

Is Maddon serious? That would’ve been like Barry Trotz blaming Zach Aston-Reese for skating into Tom Wilson’s shoulder with his jaw.

Conversely, Maddon went so far as to call Rizzo’s slide a “perfect play.” He even suggested that’s how kids should learn how to play the game.

Here’s to hoping Maddon never coaches a little league team.

The Pirates Twitter account had some fun at Maddon’s expense after Diaz homered.

Well played.

Diaz took that negative critique for his role in the incident at home plate in stride.

“I didn’t know he made those comments about me,” Diaz said. “I understand that he’s protecting his players, but he is only seeing it from one way. If that’s the way he wants to speak and judge the play, then that’s on him.”

On a few occasions since the Rizzo slide, Maddon talked about his “baseball sensibilities being under attack.”

Someone should tell Maddon that’s the very point of changing the rules to protect catchers and middle infielders on such plays. The hope is to change “our sensibilities” regarding how we view the legality of take out slides and the breaking up of double play chances.

That’s the goal: To change the belief that it’s OK for a guy who has already been ruled out to continue with a play in an effort to wipe out a player who is — in some cases — stiff-legged, having already planted to make a throw.

A play like that doesn’t make me think, “Is this new rule OK?” I think now, more than ever, why was the old way OK for so long? Why had it been acceptable for a guy who has been retired to intentionally “break up” an ongoing play and risk injury to an eligible fielder?

Maddon can protest the legality of Rizzo’s slide all he wants. He’s wrong. Major League Baseball said as much .

It’s obvious Rizzo violated Rule 6.01 (i). It states “if a runner does not engage in a bona fide slide, and initiates (or attempts to make) contact with the fielder for the purpose of breaking up a double play, he should be called for interference.”

All those opinions from Maddon were bad. But his blame-shifting to Diaz was even worse.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.