ShareThis Page
5 reasons Pitt is the ACC Coastal champion |

5 reasons Pitt is the ACC Coastal champion

David M. Brown
| Sunday, November 18, 2018 4:42 p.m
Steven Adams | Tribune-Review
A statue of Fame sits atop the 1871 Soldiers Memorial overlooking Lake Elizabeth in the West Park section of Allegheny Commons, Monday, August 18, 2014.
Pittsburgh’s Rafael Kenny Picket (8) fakes a hand off to Qadree Ollison (30) against Wake Forest during the first half of their NCAA college football game Saturday, Nov. 17, 2018 in Winston-Salem, N.C. (AP Photo/Woody Marshall)

While he was drying off from a victory shower at the hands of his players, Pitt coach Pat Narduzzi had plenty of thoughts running through his head.

Among them were Pitt’s 19 seniors, who survived the most recent coaching upheaval, stuck with the program under the new coach entering the 2015 season and now can celebrate the harvest of their persistence.

“It’s something everybody wants to be is a champion,” Narduzzi said after the victory at Wake Forest nailed down the ACC Coastal title. “Our guys never stopped believing.”

College football is paying attention. Pitt is 24th in the Associated Press poll and 25th in the Amway Coaches Poll.

It’s says something about Narduzzi’s program — and his desire to be 1-0 every week — that he and quarterback Kenny Pickett referenced the upcoming Miami game in the midst of the postgame jubliation.

Nothing that happens Saturday in south Florida matters in the standings, but the game is not meaningless. Narduzzi knows it and will hammer that home to his players.

The Panthers are in the midst of their second four-game winning streak this decade (both under Narduzzi), and it’s crucial Pitt maintains momentum. Also, a victory assures Narduzzi of three eight-victory seasons in his four years at Pitt.

Here are five reasons Pitt became a champion: 

1. Depth is better

Defensive end Dewayne Hendrix, who had 3½ sacks in the previous two games, did not play against Wake Forest because of an unspecified injury.

That meant coordinator Randy Bates has replaced three starters over the past five games.

Linebacker Quintin Wirginis and defensive tackle Keyshon Camp already were lost for the season, but Elias Reynolds has stepped in for Wirginis and played well. You can’t find redshirt freshman Albert Tucker on the depth chart, but there he is on the stat sheet with three tackles. On the line, Amir Watts, Jaylen Twyman, Rashad Wheeler and others have joined the rotation.

The defense, actually, has gotten stronger, keeping the opponent’s running game under 100 yards in three of the past five games and putting pressure on the quarterback.

End Patrick Jones II, who received more playing time with Hendrix out, had a sack and shared another tackle for loss. Linebacker Cam Bright, listed third on the depth chart, also had a sack.

Every coach wants to play as many players as possible. Narduzzi finally has enough quality depth to make it work.

2. Narduzzi coaches aggressively

It wasn’t the riskiest gamble, but Narduzzi kept his punter on the sideline in the third quarter on a fourth-and-1 call from the Wake Forest 45.

Pitt trailed, 10-6, and Narduzzi knew it was time to make a move. Qadree Ollison ran for 2 yards to keep the drive alive, and Pitt eventually scored to take the lead for good. Pitt is 7 for 14 in fourth-down conversion attempts this season.

3. Speaking of gambles …

Pitt continues to use unconventional methods to score, with left tackle Stefano Millin catching a backwards pass and carrying it 6 yards for a touchdown with 3 minutes, 22 seconds left in the game. Now, Millin could become a candidate for the Piesman Trophy that goes to a lineman who does more than block. It was won by former Pitt tackle Brian O’Neill two years ago.

“I was nervous,” Millin said. “I knew it was going to work, but my first thought was don’t drop it. I’m just glad they think I’m not athletic. Brian is probably 10 times the athlete I am.”

One nitpick: Why use trickery in a game that already had been decided? Now, the element of surprise is gone.

4. Pickett throws, hands off and more

It wasn’t enough that Pickett had a career game, completing 23 of 30 passes for 316 yards and three touchdowns.

He almost scored on a 12-yard run, three plays before Millin’s touchdown. Earlier, he tried to shove George Aston forward while two defenders were dragging the fullback down.

The big news is the emergence of the passing game. Pickett completed one more pass than he did in the previous three games combined. He also stretched his interception-free streak to 110 attempts over 5 1/2 games.

In the past two games, Maurice Ffrench and Taysir Mack have combined for 14 receptions for 342 yards (a 24.4 average) and three touchdowns.

After rushing for a total of 1,230 yards in the previous three games, Pitt collected only 154 against Wake Forest.

“Every week is a different week,” Pickett said, “and you don’t know what the defense is going to give you.”

5. Deficits haven’t mattered

Pitt has trailed in four of its past five victories, three of those in the second half.

“We came in at halftime and we looked at each other,” Pickett said. “No one was screaming and yelling. We said, ‘All right, it’s a game right now. We have to go finish this thing.’ ”

Get the latest news about Pitt football and all things Panthers athletics.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

Categories: Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.