North Carolina’s Switzer still threat against Pitt |

North Carolina’s Switzer still threat against Pitt

North Carolina sophomore All-American Ryan Switzer soothed some hurt feelings in his native West Virginia last season, when he returned two punts for touchdowns against Pitt.

“This was a big step for me as a true freshman college football player on the big stage against a team that I grew up hating,” he told reporters this week while taking a break from preparations for the Pitt rematch Saturday in Chapel Hill, N.C.

“It helped win a lot of hearts over in good, old West Virginia for leaving and going out of state (to college). I think I made some people happy (by) beating their rival.”

Switzer originally broke a few of those hearts — plus some in State College and several other outposts — when he matriculated to North Carolina in 2013.

Switzer, who grew up in Charleston, W.Va., and said he also dislikes the Pittsburgh professional teams, was considered one of the top athletes in the state when he left George Washington High School. He was two-time state player of the year as a 5-foot-9, 166-pound running back, and also helped his school win West Virginia basketball and sprint relay championships in the 4×100 and 4×200.

Then, all of sudden, he was gone.

At the time, Switzer said, “it’s not that big of a deal.”

“It’s not like I’m the next LeBron James or anything. That’s definitely not me,” said Switzer, who had 11 offers from Power 5 schools, including Florida State, West Virginia and Penn State.

In any case, Switzer lived up to his high school hype, tying an NCAA record and setting the ACC mark with five punts returned for touchdowns last season. Now listed at 5-10, 180 pounds, he has turned into a bigger threat in the passing game than he was a year ago, leading the team with 44 receptions.

He also has thrown a touchdown pass in each of the past two seasons. He also volunteered his kicking services — he hit a 38-yard field goal as a sophomore in high school — but North Carolina coach Larry Fedora declined the offer.

Surprisingly, Switzer has not been a repeat threat in the return game this season. He has returned 30 punts but is 10th in the ACC with an average of 5.2 yards — compared to a nation-best 20.9 last year — and no touchdowns. The ensuing fan criticism, along with North Carolina’s 4-5 record, led to him severing ties with social media, he told

Fedora said opponents were kicking away from Switzer early in the season, but that hasn’t been the case recently.

“Ryan really tried to make too much happen,” Fedora said. “That kind of got him behind the eight ball in a lot of situations. I think he’s becoming much more patient and just taking advantage of the ones that are there.”

Switzer didn’t return his first punt for a touchdown last season until Nov. 9 against Virginia, so Pitt still considers him a threat. In fact, special teams coach Chris Haering said his North Carolina video study revealed three returns for touchdowns nullified by penalties.

“He’s still doing his thing,” Haering said.

Haering said it’s not always practical to punt out of bounds.

“It’s just a harder angle fo those guys,” he said. “It’s difficult to do and get a decent punt. You try to directional punt, but just kicking it out of bounds is very difficult. You just don’t pick that up in a week.”

The key is punter Ryan Winslow hanging the ball in the air, Haering said.

“He has to hang it up there, so we can get down there and get it covered. It’s a challenge. It’s going to take all 11 guys to stop him.”

Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.