Panthers fall to Hawaii in game they were expected to win |

Panthers fall to Hawaii in game they were expected to win

Getty Images
In this file photo from November 2013, Pitt's Chris Jones takes a shot against Texas Tech during their Legends Classic game. The sophomore guard led three players in double figures with 19 points, as the Panthers were upset by Hawaii, 74-70, before 1,203 fans early Saturday morning.

WAILUKU, Hawaii – It was a great early-season challenge for Pitt’s younger players in a game they were expected to win.

The Panthers, however, fell to Hawaii, 74-70, before 1,203 fans early Saturday morning at War Memorial Gym in what could only be labeled an upset.

Perhaps the biggest surprise was that fans didn’t storm the court after the game.

Playing in a hot, cramped gymnasium with no air conditioning, the Panthers (2-1) were pushed to the limit physically and emotionally by an underdog opponent with something to prove.

“It’s what we expected,” said Pitt coach Jamie Dixon, a former Hawaii assistant. “We needed to handle it better. They came out hungry.”

Pitt led only briefly in the second half. Hawaii never trailed following Mike Thomas’ emphatic dunk that made it 62-60 with 6:45 to play.

Sophomore guard Chris Jones led three Pitt players in double figures with a career-high 19 points. Jones made 5-of-8 3-pointers.

Sophomore forward Michael Young scored 13 points with a team-high nine rebounds and junior point guard James Robinson added 12 points and six assists for the Panthers.

Hawaii (4-1) may play in the Big West and feature a lineup of no-star players, but the Rainbows – fueled by their raucous and energetic fans – gave the Panthers a night to forget.

Hawaii led 40-36 at intermission. The Rainbows placed two players in double figures, led by freshman Isaac Fleming’s 15 points, and shot a scalding 56.7 percent from the field in the first half and 52.9 percent overall.

“Our defense allowed them to feel confident,” said Dixon, who continues to stress that poor defense is his greatest concern. “We’ve got a lot of things to work on defensively.”

From the beginning, you could tell the game was special to Hawaii’s players, who engaged in pregame theatrics with the Panthers.

Hawaii’s starting backcourt featured players from Los Angeles and Oakland, so displaying confidence against a team from the ACC wouldn’t be a problem. Throughout the first half, Hawaii’s players yelled at Pitt’s bench following made baskets.

Pitt trailed early, 7-2, prompting Dixon to call timeout and switch to a quicker and smaller lineup featuring Josh Newkirk, Sheldon Jeter and Cameron Johnson. The early lineup change has become a common thread in the first three games.

It helped the Panthers recover and take a 23-13 lead, as they spread the floor and created open looks for Jones and Johnson, who were red-hot from the perimeter.

If the Panthers thought that Hawaii would just go away, they were wrong. In fact,Hawaii was only getting warmed up.

The Rainbows fed off the emotion provided by their home fans, reversing momentum courtesy of a 14-2 run and building a 37-32 lead.

Offensively, the Panthers went stagnant as Young sat with two fouls and was limited to 11 first-half minutes.

Jones led Pitt with 11 first-half points, Newkirk added 7 and Young 6.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.