Archive

ShareThis Page
Pat Narduzzi doesn’t expect to see another Pitt/Penn State game after 2019 | TribLIVE.com
Pitt

Pat Narduzzi doesn’t expect to see another Pitt/Penn State game after 2019

Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, September 5, 2018 1:18 p.m.
199467gtrnarduzzi03082518
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt head coach Pat Narduzzi during practice Aug. 2018 at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.

Pitt coach Pat Narduzzi said he doesn’t believe there will be another game in the Penn State series after the schools’ four-year contract expires in 2019.

“It’s sad to even think about it,” he said. “It’s a huge part of the state of Pennsylvania and the city of Pittsburgh.”

Narduzzi said it can’t be scheduled “unless there are two sides that want to do it and are committed to a big game and an in-state rivalry.”

Pitt has offered to schedule more games after the two teams meet next year in State College, but Penn State officials have not agreed to another contract. Next year’s game will be the 100th in the series.

Meanwhile, both schools have scheduled other non-conference opponents. Pitt has four non-conference openings per year; Penn State only three.

Penn State recently scheduled Temple, a non-Power 5 school from the American Athletic Conference, for a home-and-home series in 2026 and 2027. It also will play home games against Villanova in 2021 and 2025 and Delaware in 2023 and 2027.

“I might be old coming back here talking to a future team here, like Mike Ditka, if it ever happens,” said Narduzzi, 52.

The teams will meet Saturday night at Heinz Field in the last scheduled game in the series in Pittsburgh. It will be televised nationally by ABC in front of a sellout crowd of nearly 70,000 people.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at jdipaola@tribweb.com or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.