ShareThis Page
Pitt baseball eyes strong finish, postseason run |

Pitt baseball eyes strong finish, postseason run

The Associated Press
| Thursday, May 9, 2013 11:15 p.m
Justin Merriman | Tribune-Review
University of Pittsburgh's head baseball coach, Joe Jordano talks to the umpire during Pitt's game against the University of Akron at Charles L. Cost Field in Oakland on Wednesday evening, May 1, 2013.

Pitt’s nationally ranked baseball team concludes its final home series in the Big East with three games against Villanova beginning at 6 p.m. Friday at Cost Field.

The Panthers, ranked No. 17 in the Collegiate Baseball Newspaper poll and No. 24 by Baseball America, have swept four consecutive three-game series against Big East opponents since losing three straight games against South Florida in early April.

Pitt (37-11, 15-3) has swept five conference series this season. The Panthers, who will play in the ACC next season, are 9-0 at home in conference play.

“I feel we should be 18-0 right now in the Big East,” said senior infielder Sam Parente, who was voted the first-team captain under veteran coach Joe Jordano. “It’s been a special season. To top it off with a Big East (championship) would be special.”

“We were (picked) seventh in the Big East,” said junior outfielder/pitcher Casey Roche. “(No Pitt players) thought that at all. We felt we were going to win the Big East.”

Roche said the Panthers, who won their last Big East regular-season title in 1994 and their last conference tournament in ’95, are enjoying the season too much to realize what they are doing.

“We’re a little young and naive, so there’s no pressure at all,” he said.

Pitt gained momentum after three losses at South Florida by a total of three runs, Jordano said. The Panthers have won 15 straight conference games since.

“The first game (1-0 loss) we had opportunities — they scored an unearned run. The second game (7-6) we lost in the bottom of the ninth — a walk-off. The last game (3-2 loss) it was 2-2 going into the ninth,” Jordano said. “I thought in that particular series we pitched well. We did a great job defensively, with the exception of that one play in the first inning of the first game. USF is good, probably the best USF team since I’ve been in the league. But at that point, we knew we could play with anyone.”

Pitt and USF are tied atop the Big East. Louisville follows with a 14-4 conference record.

Although Villanova (2-16), Pitt’s upcoming opponent, is last in the Big East, Jordano maintains the Panthers aren’t taking anything for granted.

“Villanova has three (pitchers) that have been very competitive and kept them in games,” Jordano said. “We certainly can’t look past this weekend.”

Villanova starters Josh Harris, Pat Young and Stephen Ostapeck have ERAs of 3.34, 4.09 and 4.66, respectively. They’ll face a Pitt lineup leading the Big East in home runs, RBI, runs, hits, slugging percentage and total bases while ranking second in batting average.

The Big East regular-season champion receives the top seed at the Big East Championships from May 22-26 in Clearwater, Fla.

John Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @JHarris_Trib.

Categories: Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.