ShareThis Page
Pitt coach Narduzzi adds N.J. linebacker recruit |

Pitt coach Narduzzi adds N.J. linebacker recruit

Jerry DiPaola
| Sunday, January 25, 2015 7:09 p.m

Pitt coach Pat Narduzzi continued to work on his future defensive lineup when he received a verbal commitment Sunday from outside linebacker Saleem Brightwell of Paramus, N.J.

Brightwell (6-foot-1, 195 pounds) is the fifth member of the Class of 2015 to commit to Pitt since Narduzzi was hired Dec. 26. All five prospects will play defense at Pitt. Narduzzi developed a relationship with Brightwell when he was defensive coordinator at Michigan State.

Brightwell was one of six players who visited the Pitt campus this weekend. Defensive end Allen Edwards of Franklin (Mass.) Dean Junior College committed Saturday.

“I was interested in Pitt from the beginning before I visited,” Brightwell said. He said he has 16 offers, including Michigan State, Nebraska and Wisconsin, and had visited Missouri and Miami.

“It was between Pitt and Miami,” he said. “Both recruited me really hard. Both were up front with me.

“I thought the (Pitt) players were genuine. The players are excited about the new (coaching) staff.”

Pitt has 15 verbal commitments, with national letter of intent day set for Feb. 4.

— Jerry DiPaola

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review pitt football reporter. You can contact Jerry at 412-320-7997, or via Twitter .

Categories: Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.