ShareThis Page
Pitt coach Pat Narduzzi still searching for starting quarterback |

Pitt coach Pat Narduzzi still searching for starting quarterback

| Monday, September 25, 2017 1:30 p.m
Chaz Palla
Pitt head coach Pat Narduzzi yells during the Oklahoma State game Saturday, Sept. 16, 2017 at Heinz Field.

Pitt coach Pat Narduzzi said Monday he still isn’t ready to name a starting quarterback for Saturday’s game against Rice, even though Ben DiNucci said he was told by the coach, “I’m still the guy.”

“We’re still searching,” Narduzzi said. “It will be a work in progress this week and we’ll see what happens.

“He’s still one of our guys,” he said of DiNucci. “We have two of them we like.”

Narduzzi didn’t deny making that comment to DiNucci after the 35-17 loss to Georgia Tech on Saturday. But he said he made the remark prior to DiNucci’s postgame interview with reporters as a way to build up his confidence and congratulate him for the well-orchestrated touchdown drive to start the game.

“I wanted to make sure he went in with confidence with you guys (reporters) so you guys didn’t get after him,” Narduzzi said.

DiNucci, a sophomore from Pine-Richland, made his first collegiate start against Georgia Tech, completing 12 of 19 passes for 110 yards, one touchdown and no interceptions.

After he lost a fumble on a botched handoff in the fourth quarter, DiNucci was replaced by senior Max Browne, the former starter.

Pitt was trailing, 28-17. at the time, and Browne finished the game, completing 10 of 15 passes for 88 yards.

“I thought Ben did some nice things,” Narduzzi said. “I thought Max did some great things when he was in there, too. “There are some things we need to do better. When we have eight three-and-outs, I don’t feel very good. It was our worst performance running the ball (37 yards).

“Ben can make plays with his feet. He scrambles around and does a lot of things, but he still has a lot of room for improvement as well does Max.

“When you watch the tape, there are a lot of things we have to work on.”

Categories: Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.