ShareThis Page
Pitt football notebook: Pat Narduzzi purposefully vague on his plans for V’Lique Carter |

Pitt football notebook: Pat Narduzzi purposefully vague on his plans for V’Lique Carter

| Monday, October 29, 2018 7:24 p.m
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt's V'Lique Carter avoids Duke's Joe Files-Harris on the way to a touchdown in the fourth quarter Saturday, Oct. 27, 2018 at Heinz Field.

Pitt coach Pat Narduzzi offered Bronco Mendenhall considerable praise Monday, but not what the Virginia coach really wants to hear.

That would be if Mendenhall should prepare to face newly anointed Pitt freshman sensation V’Lique Carter.

“I’m obviously not going to reveal whether we’re using him this week or not,” said Narduzzi after he announced plans to vote for Mendenhall for ACC Coach of the Year.

While the Panthers (4-4, 3-1) approach the final month of the season, they might need to win each of their four remaining games, including Friday night at Virginia, to win the ACC Coastal. All four of Pitt’s conference games have been closely contested, so Carter’s speed and elusiveness could be the difference.

He ran seven times for 137 yards and two touchdowns in Pitt’s come-from-behind victory against Duke on Saturday.

Narduzzi must weigh whether it’s best to use Carter now, with a conference title at stake, or save a season for later by limiting him to a total of four games so he can redshirt.

In all probability, Narduzzi already has made up his mind with gameplan implementation accelerated by the short work week.

But he still enjoyed planting seeds of doubt at his Monday news conference.

“We have to pick and choose when it’s important to use him,” he said. “We’ll find out. It depends on the matchup and what we feel like we got.”

He said Virginia’s 3-4 defense offers different problems than Duke’s base four-man front, with only two linebackers.

“Peace (Virginia’s weakside linebacker, Chris) hanging off the edge doesn’t make it easy to do much,” he said. “Every week it will be a matchup as we go.

“Certainly when you watch (Carter) play, maybe he could have played since Game 1. You’d like to preserve it if you could. I think we got other good players that can make plays happen.

“Was he lucky? Is he good? I don’t know. Maybe he just got lucky that day. I don’t know. Maybe (the game) just set up perfectly for him. I think some other guys can do the same thing.”

Where’s Carter?

He also was vague on which position group meeting Carter, 5-foot-9, 170 pounds, attends.

“He works with wide receivers, sometimes running backs, sometimes the defensive backs,” Narduzzi said. “We haven’t put him at linebacker yet, but we’ll probably use him there, too.”

For the record, his name does not appear anywhere on the depth chart,

Keep your eyes open

In the form of a “guarantee,” Narduzzi said he plans to use one or two players against Virginia who haven’t played this season.

“You guys got to figure out who it is, like Waldo,” he said.

Stay tuned

The ACC said start time for Pitt’s final home game Nov. 10 against Virginia Tech will be announced after the results from the upcoming weekend. The conference and ESPN also put a six-day hold on kickoff times for Clemson at Boston College and Miami at Georgia Tech.

Get the latest news about Pitt football and all things Panthers athletics.

Categories: Pitt
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.