Pitt notebook: Narduzzi not entirely happy with defensive effort |

Pitt notebook: Narduzzi not entirely happy with defensive effort

Pitt’s defense started the season by intercepting two passes, recording five sacks and holding Albany’s ground game to 2.1 yards per rush.

But was coach Pat Narduzzi happy? Not especially.

“We stopped the run,” he said. “We could have maybe destroyed the run if we had tackled a little bit better.

“Our fits (players being where they’re supposed to be) were darn good, but we have to clean up the tackling. Sometimes, I think guys got their eyes closed.”

Tackling problems early in the season might be explained by the lack of hitting in practice, he said.

“We live tackled maybe six times out of 24 opportunities,” Narduzzi said. “That’s your first live chance and the first time since the Miami game (Nov. 24, 2017) since we tackled at Heinz Field. I think that’s a different deal, too.

“So, at least we got one practice under our belts, if you want to call it that.”

Too many yards in the air

The pass defense allowed completions of 40, 37 and 28 yards and an average of 14.6 to Albany quarterback Vincent Testaverde, who hadn’t played since 2014.

Narduzzi pointed out, without explanation, that three members of the secondary — cornerbacks Dane Jackson and Jason Pinnock and safety Phil Campbell III — did not play against Albany. Jackson and Campbell III were starters in the final game of last season.

He didn’t say if they will be play Saturday night against Penn State, but all three probably are nursing injuries with an unspecified degree of severity.

He might need them. Narduzzi called Penn State quarterback Trace McSorley a Heisman Trophy candidate, “maybe the front-runner for it, because he can throw it, he can run it and he’s an emotional leader.”

McSorley completed 21 of 36 passes for 230 yards, one touchdown and no interceptions in Penn State’s victory against Appalachian State.

What about Bookser?

Also on the injury front, Narduzzi didn’t say if senior offensive tackle Alex Bookser, who was kept out of the Albany game, would be ready to go Saturday.

“It will come down to how he feels and how the trainers feel,” he said.

Redshirt freshman Gabe Houy played for Bookser.

“He made some mistakes, but he got those out of the way and he’s going to be a better football player for it,” he said. “We had faith he could do it and he did it.”

Backups play, too

Narduzzi was pleased he was able to use 55 players against Albany, including backup quarterback Ricky Town.

“In three seasons, we have not been able to get our backups in the game,” he said. “We had 55 players on the offense and defense get involved in that game (not counting special teams).

“Anytime you get your backup quarterback in the game (is good). Get him a throw. Get him a handoff. Get him to check some things, just to find out where he is so he’s not getting in some other time where it’s a little bit more risky.”

Ford’s future

Redshirt freshman Paris Ford entered the game as a reserve cornerback and recorded two tackles, but Narduzzi sees Ford eventually moving to safety.

“I think Paris is going to be a great player,” he said. “He did some really good things. Now we’re not afraid to put him out there because we know what we got. He’s still got to clean up technique just like the other guys.

“He might fit better as a safety, but, mentally, it’s just a little bit less for him to get him out on the field (at cornerback). There’s a lot of stuff that goes on back there (at safety).

“Eventually that guy is going to be a heckuva safety for us.”

Blocking broke down

Narduzzi gave Maurice Ffrench almost all the credit for his 91-yard kickoff return that gave Pitt a 7-0 lead on the first play of the game.

“I can’t tell you the blocking and the setup were exactly the way we want it to be,” he said. “I give Maurice a lot of credit for what he did on that play.”

He said former walk-on Kellen McAlone missed his first block on the play but recovered nicely.

“He was well-coached, turned around and earned his scholarship by running up there and blocking the kicker,” the coach said. “Maybe he messed up the first part but finished it off and popped it open.”

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at
[email protected] or
via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.