ShareThis Page
Pitt offensive coordinator seeks efficiency from group |

Pitt offensive coordinator seeks efficiency from group

Philip G. Pavely | Trib Total Media
Pitt offensive coordinator Jim Chaney directs players Tuesday, Aug. 11, 2015, on the South Side.

After he watches that final piece of videotape and is satisfied that the day’s work is done, Pitt offensive coordinator Jim Chaney will settle onto the air mattress in his office for what is usually a peaceful night’s sleep.

Yes, he is practicing that time-honored coaches’ tradition of sleeping in his office during training camp, but he’s not doing it to impress his boss or work harder than the opposing defensive coordinators in the ACC.

“I’m not one of those knuckleheads,” he said. “I don’t stay up until 4 a.m. If anything, I’m lazy and I don’t want to drive home at 10:30.”

With Chaney’s wife and daughters out of town, staying at Pitt’s practice facility beats spending an hour in the car every day and driving home to an empty house.

“Right now, there ain’t nobody (home) but me and a plant, and I’m not going to water the darn thing.”

Chaney, though, is responsible for the care and feeding of what some under his command are calling the best offense in the ACC.

Wide receiver Tyler Boyd said so this week, and he was backed up Tuesday by offensive tackle Adam Bisnowaty, who said Pitt’s offense can be “as good as we want to be.”

Actually, anyone could make a good argument that Pitt has more star power on offense than all but Clemson in the ACC.

Three Pitt players — Boyd, Bisnowaty and running back James Conner — were named to the preseason All-ACC team. Clemson has four and the other 12 have one or none.

Boyd, Conner and Florida State kicker Roberto Aguayo are the only first-team All-ACC offensive players who returned this season.

Chaney is excited about the potential of his group, but he can wait before making any proclamations. Even Boyd said the team must stand behind its words.

“You talk about it, you be about it,” he said.

Chaney’s goals are simple.

“I want to be as efficient and as good as we have to be to win games,” he said. “If that ends up at the end of the year we are ranked high in the ACC, so be it. Our goal is to score one more point than the defense gives up.

“I think we have enough weapons to be a solid offense. I’m excited about that, but we have a long way to go.”

Chaney said the offense needs more balance and efficiency.

“Last year, (former coach) Paul (Chryst) ran the ball exceptionally well,” he said. “We would like to continue to do that and pick up the passing game. A little more efficient, a little more explosive.”

He said he “personally” likes to throw the ball downfield — a philosophy that could increase quarterback Chad Voytik’s production — but he also wants to add the screen pass to the offense.

“We would like to be good enough so we can pull it out of the tool box anytime we need it,” he said.

That means more touches for Conner.

“I don’t know if that will affect his production in the run game or not, but at the end of the day, there are a lot of yards in that body.

“My intentions are to use that horse and let him play.”

Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.