Pitt overwhelms Niagara in season opener |

Pitt overwhelms Niagara in season opener

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt's Jamel Artis gets past Niagara defenders in the second half on Friday, Nov. 14, 2014, at Petersen Events Center.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt's Cameron Johnson passes against Niagara on Friday, Nov. 14, 2014, at Petersen Events Center.
Chaz Palla | Trib Total Media
Pitt's Joseph Uchebo pulls down a rebound against Niagara on Friday, Nov. 14, 2014, at Petersen Events Center.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt's Michael Young pulls down a second-half rebound over Niagara's Rayvon Harris on Friday, Nov. 14, 2014, at Petersen Events Center.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt's Derrick Randall gets past a Niagara defender on Friday, Nov. 14, 2014, at Petersen Events Center.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt's Josh Newkirk gets around Niagara's Karonn Davis in the first half Friday, Nov. 14, 2014, at Petersen Events Center.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt's James Robinson scores over Niagara's Emile Blackman in the second half Friday, Nov. 14, 2014, at Petersen Events Center.
Chaz Palla | Trib Total Media
Pitt's Josh Newkirk scores past Niagara's Rayvon Harris in the first half Friday, Nov. 14, 2014, at Petersen Events Center.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt's Sheldon Jeter scores over Niagara's Dominique Reid in the first half Friday, Nov. 14, 2014, at Petersen Events Center.

Pitt needed to feel good about itself in Friday night’s season opener. Playing Niagara certainly helped.

The Panthers presented a snarling defensive posture against their overmatched opponent, and the offense was the beneficiary in a rollicking 78-45 victory before 9,749 fans at Petersen Events Center.

The announcement that junior forward Durand Johnson was suspended for the season cast a pall over the team before tipoff, but the Panthers were all business when the lights came on.

“We did a good job defensively early, and that was key,” Pitt coach Jamie Dixon said.

Niagara shot 20.8 percent in the first half and 12 of 48 overall (25 percent).

“He preached (defense) a lot in practice,” sophomore Jamel Artis, who scored a team-high 14 points in his first college start, said about Dixon. “Every day.”

Artis’ role is expected to increase as a result of Johnson’s suspension. Other players who also saw their roles increase in the opener were sophomore Josh Newkirk (12 points), freshman Cameron Johnson (11 points) and sophomore Chris Jones (10).

Pitt shot 63.3 percent in the first half and led 15-1 and 32-4 in the first half before settling at 46-22 at halftime.

Dixon’s preseason vow to run more also was fulfilled — at least during the first game. The Panthers defended, rebounded and scored a flurry of baskets in transition.

Artis recorded the first basket of the season, a long 3-pointer that made it 4-0. Newkirk was a blur off the bench with a jumper, three-point play and fast-break dunk courtesy of an assist from junior center Joseph Uchebo, who was making his first college start. Cameron Johnson got in the act with three baskets.

Pitt’s first-half effort was so dominant that sophomore forward Michael Young, who averaged 22.5 points and 9.0 rebounds in two exhibition games but got into early foul trouble Friday, wasn’t really involved in the offense. The Panthers didn’t need him.

MAAC member Niagara, fielding one of the youngest teams in the nation with 13 underclassmen, certainly looked the part. The Purple Eagles were 3-17 last season and lost their best player, Antoine Mason, the nation’s leading returning scorer, who transferred to Auburn. Pitt hosts another MAAC opponent, Manhattan, on Dec. 17.

“Obviously, it had a lot to do with their defense,” Niagara coach Chris Casey said. “It just steamrolled from there.”

Pitt’s next game is 1 p.m. Sunday against Samford at Petersen Events Center in its home segment of the EA Sports Maui Invitational.

John Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.