Pitt plans to send help to hurricane victims in North Carolina |

Pitt plans to send help to hurricane victims in North Carolina

Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Pitt recovers a third-quarter fumble by Georgia Tech's Clinton Lynch Saturday, Sept. 15, 2018 at Heinz Field.

More than a team is traveling to Chapel Hill, N.C., this weekend for Pitt’s game against North Carolina.

Along with footballs, helmets and shoulder pads, Pitt’s equipment truck will haul donated food and other items to help residents recover from the devastation of Hurricane Florence.

It started when Pitt communications coordinator Celeste Welsh reached out to Dave Roberts, operations manger of the Durham (N.C.) Food Bank, and asked how Pitt could help.

“He was elated to say the least,” Welsh said.

That conversation triggered an email from Pitt athletic director Heather Lyke to her staff, requesting items for a food drive.

They ended up collecting one pallet of bottled water, 13 boxes of food, paper goods, pet food, cleaning supplies and more than $400 in monetary donations. Pitt director of equipment services Derek Moos will deliver the goods directly to the Durham Food Bank on Friday morning, Welsh said.

“It’s more than a game,” coach Pat Narduzzi said on his radio show Wednesday night. “It’s about doing what’s right.”

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at [email protected] or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.