Archive

ShareThis Page
Pitt receiver Boyd’s comments spark dialogue from coach, teammates | TribLIVE.com
Pitt

Pitt receiver Boyd’s comments spark dialogue from coach, teammates

Tribune-Review
| Thursday, November 13, 2014 9:36 p.m
ptrpittduke02110114
Chaz Palla | Trib Total Media
Pitt's Tyler Boyd makes a second-quarter catch over Duke's Evertt Edwards (2) and Breon Borders Saturday, Nov. 1, 2014 at Heinz Field.

Pitt coach Paul Chryst said Thursday that sophomore wide receiver Tyler Boyd’s comments questioning some teammates’ willingness to “go all out” generated conversation among players and coaches that could be a positive force the rest of the season.

Boyd told the Tribune-Review in a story published Tuesday that “just a select few (players)” have sufficient determination to help the team win, crediting nine, including himself.

“What’s been good,” Chryst said, “it’s created some dialogue that’s been, I think, good for us. I love the conversations about ‘What do we need to do?’ ”

Among those not mentioned by Boyd in the Trib story was quarterback Chad Voytik, who told Chryst he didn’t feel threatened or offended by the comments.

Chryst said Voytik, who regularly returns to the team’s facilities after night classes to watch video until close to midnight, was the first to bring the story to his attention.

With both players in the room, Boyd told his coach, “I wish I wouldn’t have (mentioned) those names,” Chryst said.

“Chad (says) to me, ‘I get that. I forget (to mention) guys (during interviews).’ ”

Boyd is one of the most physically gifted players on the team, and his standards have been further raised by a high school career at Clairton where he never lost a game (48-0). He was a freshman All-American last year, and he is second in the ACC in receiving yards per game (87.9) this season. But Pitt has lost five of its past six games.

“I love that he has a high bar,” Chryst said. “(Boyd’s) intentions and wanting to kind of raise the level of expectations, I appreciate that.

“I really do think everyone at different stages has different definitions of doing well.

“We have some guys, and it’s probably where they should be at, but if they just do their assignment correct and are in the right gap or on the right guy, don’t have any penalties, they might say that was a good game.”

Chryst suggested Boyd’s personal expectations are higher.

“If Tyler goes and runs every route right, catches the ball that was thrown to him, he thinks he should impact the game, he should be the reason why we’re winning,” the coach said.

Chryst said he believes Boyd’s words stem from his desire for the team to get better.

“He truly wants to be a part of a winner.”

Notes: Chryst said wide receiver Manasseh Garner and backup defensive tackle Tyrique Jarrett won’t play against North Carolina while continuing to recover from foot injuries. … Without Garner, the team’s second-leading pass catcher with 17 receptions, backups Adonis Jennings, Dontez Ford and, perhaps, Jester Weah will receive more playing time. “There is going to be a group that needs to step up,” Chryst said. … Redshirt freshman defensive end Luke Maclean will have season-ending ankle surgery, Chryst said.

Jerry DiPaola is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at jdipaola@tribweb.com or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.