Pitt survives test from D-II power Philadelphia |

Pitt survives test from D-II power Philadelphia

Pitt's Michael Young shoots over Philadelphia's Peter Alexis in the first half of an exhibition game Friday, Nov. 7, 2014.
Pitt coach Jamie Dixon watches his team play against Philadelphia in the first half of an exhibition game Friday, Nov. 7, 2014.
Philadelphia's Derek Johnson shoots over Pitt's James Robinson in the first half of an exhibition game Friday, Nov. 7, 2014.
Philadelphia coach Herb Magee signals to his team in the first half of an exhibition game Friday, Nov. 7, 2014.
Pitt's Jamel Artis (top) defends as Philadelphia's TJ Huggins looks to pass in the second half of an exhibition game Friday, Nov. 7, 2014.
Pitt's Jamel Artis (right) and Philadelphia's Andre Gibbs chase a loose ball in the second half of an exhibition game Friday, Nov. 7, 2014.
Philadelphia's Derek Johnson hits a 3-pointer between Pitt's Jamel Artis (left) and James Robinson in the second half of an exhibition game Friday, Nov. 7, 2014.
Pitt's James Robinson tries to shoot over Philadelphia University's Peter Alexis during the first half of an exhibition game Friday, Nov. 7, 2014.
Pitt's Durand Johnson shoots a 3-pointer over Philadelphia's TJ Huggins in the first half of an exhibition game Friday, Nov. 7, 2014.

If Pitt coach Jamie Dixon wanted a test for his players in their final exhibition game, he found one.

The Panthers trailed Division II Philadelphia University at halftime Friday night, but they put together a frenetic offensive display and raced to a 82-71 victory over the Rams at Petersen Events Center.

Defensively, however, not so much.

“We’ve got some guys that made some shots and did some things but hurt us defensively,” said Dixon, who took a long time before meeting with reporters after the game. “I thought (Philadelphia) was a clinic offensively.”

Meanwhile, Pitt shot 69.2 percent in the second half and outscored the visitors 48-36 after halftime, but Dixon wasn’t happy.

“Offensively, we’re pretty good,” Dixon said. “We’re making the same mistakes (defensively). Too many open looks, and we’re paying for it.”

Sophomore forward Michael Young led Pitt with 21 points and 11 rebounds. Junior forward Durand Johnson added 19 points, and junior point guard James Robinson 16.

Philadelphia junior forward Derek Johnson scored a game-high 34 points and made 7 of 13 3-pointers.

“Our defense wasn’t that good,” Young said.

Philadelphia coach Herb Magee, the winningest coach in men’s basketball, is known as the “Shot Doctor” for good reason. In his 49th season at the school, he regularly produces excellent shooting teams. The Rams, ranked No. 14 in the preseason D-II poll, shot 48.1 percent in the first half (including 5 of 9 on 3-pointers) and led 35-34 at intermission.

“We’ve got a good team,” Magee said. “Our scouting report was to play zone because we didn’t think they were a good shooting team.”

Trailing by one, Pitt opened the second half with three 3-pointers after closing the first half with a pair of 3-pointers. The Panthers hit their first seven shots of the second half.

Through it all, Young was the catalyst, dominating inside with a dunk and two other high-percentage baskets as Pitt regained the lead.

“I didn’t think he could shoot like that,” Magee said.

Philadelphia’s defense had no answer for Young, but the same could be said for the Panthers defense against Derek Johnson, who buried one shot after another. His 3-pointer made it 61-61 with 10 minutes remaining.

Durand Johnson’s 3-point play and jumper gave Pitt breathing room at 68-61 and his 3-pointer made it 74-64 at the 4:48 mark.

“We’re kind of a team in the works,” said Dixon.

Pitt opens the regular season Nov. 14 against Niagara at Petersen Events Center.

John Harris is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at [email protected]

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.