ShareThis Page
Pitt tight end eager for 2nd chance |

Pitt tight end eager for 2nd chance

Jerry DiPaola
Courtesy UCLA Athletics
Pitt and former UCLA tight end Chris Clark says the Panthers’ style of offense is a good fit for him. “UCLA is more of a spread offense,” he said. “Here, we are more of a pro style. At UCLA, it felt like I was being developed more into a very large wide receiver. I know what makes me good is I’m a true tight end.”

Almost lost in the optimistic talk surrounding signing day at Pitt is a second-year player who appears to have found hope in a new home.

Tight end Chris Clark is part of the 25-man Class of 2016 introduced this week by coach Pat Narduzzi, but Pitt’s letter of intent is not the first he has signed.

“My recruitment has been crazy, crazy,” he said.

A year ago, Clark was in ESPN’s studios pledging to UCLA as the nation’s No. 1 tight end after he had decommitted from North Carolina and Michigan.

After one game — he said it amounted to “13 or 14 snaps” in the opener — he decided to transfer, in part to be closer to home in Ridgewood, N.J.

“It was extremely far from home,” he said. “It just wasn’t really the best fit in terms of (how) I wanted to be developed as a tight end.”

Clark was planning to transfer to Syracuse, but he never made a strong connection with former coach Scott Shafer. Meanwhile, Narduzzi always was lurking in the shadows of Clark’s recruitment.

“I’ve been recruiting him for three years,” said Narduzzi, who also tried to get him to enroll at Michigan State.

Clark, who enrolled in January, has built a connection with Pitt’s coach that he hasn’t been able to develop with others.

“It’s really great to find a head coach who’s as genuine as Coach Narduzzi is,” Clark said. “Because a lot of these guys in this business aren’t as real.”

Clark admits his recruitment has been unconventional.

“It’s definitely not something that I would look back at and be proud of how it’s all happened,” he said. “But now that I’ve found a home, I think I’m going to be able to develop into a great player and person.”

Clark (6-foot-6, 257 pounds) said he believes Pitt’s style of offense is a better fit for him.

“UCLA is more of a spread offense,” he said, noting he has gained 24 pounds since leaving the Bruins. “Here, we are more of a pro style. At UCLA, it felt like I was being developed more into a very large wide receiver.

“I know what makes me good is I’m a true tight end. I put my hand in the dirt, and I can run and catch the ball.”

His receiving skills emerged at Avon Old Farms (Conn.) School, where he averaged 19.4 yards per catch, with 32 receptions for 621 yards and seven touchdowns in 2014. He also attended Don Bosco (N.J.) Prep.

The next hurdle for Clark is gaining NCAA clearance to play this season without sitting out the one year required of most transfers.

“We’re fighting for him to be able to line up and play for us this year,” Narduzzi said.

“I think my situation is pretty unique,” Clark said. “I definitely had some personal things that were affecting me at school.

“I find it hard to believe you would make someone miss two full seasons of football. I just don’t understand the reason for that.”

Notes: Returning linebackers Bam Bradley and Anthony McKee might limited by shoulder injuries when spring drills begin next month. … Coaches are expecting 33 junior prospects on campus this weekend.

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at [email protected] or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.