Pitt, West Virginia will ‘brawl’ at PNC Park next season |

Pitt, West Virginia will ‘brawl’ at PNC Park next season

Pitt and West Virginia will take the baseball version of the Backyard Brawl to PNC Park on May 14, 2019, the first time those teams have met each other in the home of the Pittsburgh Pirates.

Pitt hasn’t played at PNC Park since the 2009 season and owns a 3-2 record there from 2003-2009. All games were against Duquesne, which no longer has a baseball program. West Virginia has defeated Penn State at PNC Park in each of the past two seasons.

The Pitt/West Virginia baseball rivalry dates to 1939, with the Mountaineers owning an 83-73 all-time advantage.

“We are grateful to (President) Frank Coonelly and the Pittsburgh Pirates organization for providing our student-athletes with an unbelievable experience,” Pitt coach Mike Bell said in a statement. “We look forward to continuing to work together to provide our team with memories that will last a lifetime.”

West Virginia has taken the field at PNC Park in each of the last two seasons, claiming victories both times against Penn State.

“The rivalry continues at PNC Park,” Pitt pitcher Chris Gomez said. “Being able to play West Virginia in the best stadium in baseball is very humbling and exciting for our program.”

Added Pitt infielder David Yanni, “Since I’ve been here, games against WVU have always been ones that I circle on our schedule. The games are always so highly anticipated by us players, but also the fans. Now that we have the privilege to play them at one of the most beautiful ballparks in America, the anticipation has been amped up. It is an awesome rivalry to be a part of and I can’t wait to step on the field at PNC Park to take on the Mountaineers.”

Jerry DiPaola is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jerry at [email protected] or via Twitter @JDiPaola_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.